The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission

Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission
Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission
This article examines the production and publication of the Parekh Report (2000) by drawing upon two related current debates - the decline of the public intellectual and the necessity for a public sociology. It argues that both of these debates have failed to engage with concrete examples of public intellectual labour, with the complexities of public communication and have been reticent as to which particular intellectual voices are able to enter the public sphere. The article argues that the intellectually orientated, multiculturally constituted Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain Commission which authored the report and the report’s moment of publication both offer sites in which these critiques can be developed. The article foregrounds the question as to who is entitled to inaugurate, participate in and shape public debates on race, nation, and national identity and evidences the difficulties of attempting to do so in a ‘race volatile’, anti-intellectual and heavily mediated political milieu.
britishness, identity, multicultural, nation, public intellectuals, parekh Report, public sphere, race
0950-2386
910-930
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0

McLaughlin, Eugene and Neal, Sarah (2007) Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission. [in special issue: Rethinking Convergence/Culture] Cultural Studies, 21 (6), 910-930. (doi:10.1080/09502380701470791).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article examines the production and publication of the Parekh Report (2000) by drawing upon two related current debates - the decline of the public intellectual and the necessity for a public sociology. It argues that both of these debates have failed to engage with concrete examples of public intellectual labour, with the complexities of public communication and have been reticent as to which particular intellectual voices are able to enter the public sphere. The article argues that the intellectually orientated, multiculturally constituted Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain Commission which authored the report and the report’s moment of publication both offer sites in which these critiques can be developed. The article foregrounds the question as to who is entitled to inaugurate, participate in and shape public debates on race, nation, and national identity and evidences the difficulties of attempting to do so in a ‘race volatile’, anti-intellectual and heavily mediated political milieu.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 3 September 2007
Published date: November 2007
Keywords: britishness, identity, multicultural, nation, public intellectuals, parekh Report, public sphere, race
Organisations: Social Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339764
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339764
ISSN: 0950-2386
PURE UUID: 127f45e6-7978-4c2f-bedd-8bbfcfcb8372

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 May 2012 08:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eugene McLaughlin
Author: Sarah Neal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×