The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The axillary nodal harvest in breast cancer surgery is unchanged by sentinel node biopsy or the timing of surgery

The axillary nodal harvest in breast cancer surgery is unchanged by sentinel node biopsy or the timing of surgery
The axillary nodal harvest in breast cancer surgery is unchanged by sentinel node biopsy or the timing of surgery
Patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy may undergo delayed completion axillary dissection. Where intraoperative analysis is available, immediate completion axillary dissection can be performed. Alternatively, patients may undergo primary axillary dissection for breast cancer, historically or when preoperative assessment suggests axillary metastases. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in the total number of lymph nodes or the number of metastatic nodes harvested between the 3 possible approaches. Methods. Three consecutive comparable groups of 50 consecutive patients who underwent axillary dissection in each of the above contexts were identified from the Portsmouth Breast Unit Database. Patient demographics, clinicopathological variables, and surgical treatment were recorded. The total pathological nodal count and the number of metastatic nodes were compared between the groups. Results. There were no differences in clinico-pathological features between the three groups for all features studied with the exception of breast surgical procedure (P<0.001). There were no differences in total nodal harvest (P=0.822) or in the number of positive nodes harvested (P=0.157) between the three groups. Conclusion. The three approaches to axillary clearance yield equivalent nodal harvests, suggesting oncological equivalence and robustness of surgical technique.
2090-3189
1-5
Byrne, B.E.
5aceb706-8483-48fd-8367-539f2c619a73
Cutress, R.I.
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Gill, J.
729b879a-f743-45f1-82a8-e554b769f610
Wise, M.H.
8d47f2db-a6fb-4516-ab54-72594c9508f1
Yiangou, C.
e58f7811-c036-4085-b3b2-25a5ce0a6f09
Agrawal, A.
6f9fe130-fc73-4d92-8052-967879ae7810
Byrne, B.E.
5aceb706-8483-48fd-8367-539f2c619a73
Cutress, R.I.
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Gill, J.
729b879a-f743-45f1-82a8-e554b769f610
Wise, M.H.
8d47f2db-a6fb-4516-ab54-72594c9508f1
Yiangou, C.
e58f7811-c036-4085-b3b2-25a5ce0a6f09
Agrawal, A.
6f9fe130-fc73-4d92-8052-967879ae7810

Byrne, B.E., Cutress, R.I., Gill, J., Wise, M.H., Yiangou, C. and Agrawal, A. (2012) The axillary nodal harvest in breast cancer surgery is unchanged by sentinel node biopsy or the timing of surgery. International Journal of Breast Cancer, 2012 (467825), 1-5. (doi:10.1155/2012/467825).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy may undergo delayed completion axillary dissection. Where intraoperative analysis is available, immediate completion axillary dissection can be performed. Alternatively, patients may undergo primary axillary dissection for breast cancer, historically or when preoperative assessment suggests axillary metastases. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in the total number of lymph nodes or the number of metastatic nodes harvested between the 3 possible approaches. Methods. Three consecutive comparable groups of 50 consecutive patients who underwent axillary dissection in each of the above contexts were identified from the Portsmouth Breast Unit Database. Patient demographics, clinicopathological variables, and surgical treatment were recorded. The total pathological nodal count and the number of metastatic nodes were compared between the groups. Results. There were no differences in clinico-pathological features between the three groups for all features studied with the exception of breast surgical procedure (P<0.001). There were no differences in total nodal harvest (P=0.822) or in the number of positive nodes harvested (P=0.157) between the three groups. Conclusion. The three approaches to axillary clearance yield equivalent nodal harvests, suggesting oncological equivalence and robustness of surgical technique.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2012
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339926
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339926
ISSN: 2090-3189
PURE UUID: 646ce301-e2b2-42d5-8969-f4a152a94282

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Jun 2012 14:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: B.E. Byrne
Author: R.I. Cutress
Author: J. Gill
Author: M.H. Wise
Author: C. Yiangou
Author: A. Agrawal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×