The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Early-informational biases in judgement and decision-making: a dual-process and a dynamic-stochastic modelling approach

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

The thesis herein explores the relationship between early and late information in judgement and decision-making and tests a quantitative model of this relationship based on contemporary dual-process theory. The first chapter reviews literature regarding early information as a potential biasing factor in judgement and decision-making, the neglect of dual-process theory in the domain and the tendency to rely on static modelling techniques derived from economic theory. The first empirical chapter concludes that a synthesis of a static-economic decision model (prospect theory) with contemporary dual-process theory principles can better predict choice behaviour than either one approach alone. I conclude that dual-process theory provides a strong theoretical basis for understanding the cognitive processes involved in early-informational biases, but also that the quantitative approaches to modelling choice behaviour can provide valuable additional insights. The third chapter acts on this conclusion by developing a dynamic-stochastic choice model (based on a sequential sample process) which reflects four contemporary dual-process theory concepts that are relevant to early-informational biases. Simulation results of the model are presented in order to demonstrate the choice behaviour predicted by this approach. The rest of the thesis is dedicated to empirical studies designed to test the implications of these simulation results and these predicted behaviours. The empirical studies cover a range of domains including biased predecision processing during evidence gathering, stereotype bias in multi-attribute decision-making under time-pressure and the impact of expectation and accuracy motivation on visual-search decision-making. I conclude that the dynamic-stochastic modelling approach demonstrates some clear value in understanding the cognitive processes involved in these domains and the results support the use of contemporary dual-process theory as a framework for understanding judgement and decision-making. Based on this conclusion I outline some future developments for a more nuanced dynamic model including integration with a more sophisticated way of modelling type 2 processing and expansion to account for hypothetical thinking principles. I also suggest future research domains for application of the model such as expert decision-making and multi-alternative decision problems.

PDF PAFFM_PhD_Thesis_2012.pdf - Other
Download (2MB)

Citation

Fraser-Mackenzie, Peter (2011) Early-informational biases in judgement and decision-making: a dual-process and a dynamic-stochastic modelling approach University of Southampton, School of Psychology, Doctoral Thesis , 193pp.

More information

Published date: December 2011
Organisations: University of Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339971
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339971
PURE UUID: 0722d142-d103-4b38-a031-697f625c960f
ORCID for Sarah Stevenage: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-2939

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jun 2012 14:29
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:50

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Sarah Stevenage ORCID iD

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×