The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Inter-comparison of multiple angle remotely sensed data across different spatial resolutions and sensors for determination of albedo

Inter-comparison of multiple angle remotely sensed data across different spatial resolutions and sensors for determination of albedo
Inter-comparison of multiple angle remotely sensed data across different spatial resolutions and sensors for determination of albedo
Surface albedo is one of the critical parameters required by studies of surface energy balance and climate models. Albedo is defined as the ratio of outgoing radiances to incoming irradiances over hemispherical view-illumination geometry. Remotely sensed albedo is usually based on multiple view angle observations and a Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) model. The accuracy of remotely sensed albedo depends on a variety of factors of which the main ones are the accuracy of atmospherically corrected observations, the reliability of observations, and the validity of the applied BRDF model. Fine spatial resolution airborne and satellite data are valuable for the validation of coarse spatial resolution satellite albedos as they may be validated using field measurements with higher reliability. In this study, a variety of remote sensing data and field measurements were used to estimate, validate and analyse albedo at different spatial resolutions. The main aim was to validate the MODIS albedo product under UK conditions using the methods of direct and indirect comparisons with other available data. The source of the fine spatial resolution data used was the NCAVEO Field Campaign 2006 that took place at the Chilbolton calibration test site in southern England. The CHRIS/PROBA albedo was used as a fine spatial resolution (34 m) albedo map to investigate the spatial variation of albedo. The results of this investigation provided valuable information about the possibility of the extension of the obtained albedo map from CHRIS/PROBA data. The MODIS albedo product with a coarser spatial resolution (500 m), relative to the NCAVEO datasets, was compared with the CHRIS/PROBA albedo map to examine the effect of spatial scale on the accuracy of albedo (direct comparison). The uncertainties in the obtained albedo maps, from both MODIS and CHRIS/PROBA, were mainly examined by testing the accuracy of the input reflectance data and the applied BRDF model (indirect comparison). The results showed the accuracy of the MODIS albedo product inferior to that claimed by the MODIS team.
Khavarian Nehzak, Hassan
1fedf36e-ab5e-4a01-9237-4564bc5a5455
Khavarian Nehzak, Hassan
1fedf36e-ab5e-4a01-9237-4564bc5a5455
Atkinson, Peter
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Milton, Edward
f6cb5c0d-a5d4-47d7-860f-096de08e0c24

(2012) Inter-comparison of multiple angle remotely sensed data across different spatial resolutions and sensors for determination of albedo. University of Southampton, Geography and Environment, Doctoral Thesis, 233pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Surface albedo is one of the critical parameters required by studies of surface energy balance and climate models. Albedo is defined as the ratio of outgoing radiances to incoming irradiances over hemispherical view-illumination geometry. Remotely sensed albedo is usually based on multiple view angle observations and a Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) model. The accuracy of remotely sensed albedo depends on a variety of factors of which the main ones are the accuracy of atmospherically corrected observations, the reliability of observations, and the validity of the applied BRDF model. Fine spatial resolution airborne and satellite data are valuable for the validation of coarse spatial resolution satellite albedos as they may be validated using field measurements with higher reliability. In this study, a variety of remote sensing data and field measurements were used to estimate, validate and analyse albedo at different spatial resolutions. The main aim was to validate the MODIS albedo product under UK conditions using the methods of direct and indirect comparisons with other available data. The source of the fine spatial resolution data used was the NCAVEO Field Campaign 2006 that took place at the Chilbolton calibration test site in southern England. The CHRIS/PROBA albedo was used as a fine spatial resolution (34 m) albedo map to investigate the spatial variation of albedo. The results of this investigation provided valuable information about the possibility of the extension of the obtained albedo map from CHRIS/PROBA data. The MODIS albedo product with a coarser spatial resolution (500 m), relative to the NCAVEO datasets, was compared with the CHRIS/PROBA albedo map to examine the effect of spatial scale on the accuracy of albedo (direct comparison). The uncertainties in the obtained albedo maps, from both MODIS and CHRIS/PROBA, were mainly examined by testing the accuracy of the input reflectance data and the applied BRDF model (indirect comparison). The results showed the accuracy of the MODIS albedo product inferior to that claimed by the MODIS team.

PDF
Thesis_Hassan_Khavarian_Nehzak.pdf - Other
Download (20MB)

More information

Published date: March 2012
Organisations: University of Southampton, Geography & Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339986
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339986
PURE UUID: 19ceebc7-3803-42c9-9f2e-a17b21e789a7
ORCID for Peter Atkinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5489-6880

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jun 2012 15:18
Last modified: 18 May 2019 00:38

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×