The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms

Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms
Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms
In 2001 Enochs' celebrated flat cover conjecture was finally proven and the proofs (two different proofs were presented in the same paper [5]) have since generated a great deal of interest among researchers. In particular the results have been recast in a number of other categories and in particular for additive categories (see for example [2], [3], [23] and [24]). In 2008, Mahmoudi and Renshaw considered a similar problem for acts over monoids but used a slightly different definition of cover. They proved that in general their definition was not equivalent to Enochs', except in the projective case, and left open a number of questions regarding the 'other' definition. This 'other' definition is the subject of the present paper and we attempt to emulate some of Enochs' work for the category of acts over monoids and concentrate, in the main, on strongly flat acts. We hope to extend this work to other classes of acts, such as injective, torsion-free, divisible and free, in a future report.
589-617
Renshaw, James
350100c1-f7c7-44d3-acfb-29b94f21731c
Bailey, Alex
cd2762de-6a67-4ffc-ab42-2842ca378fa8
Renshaw, James
350100c1-f7c7-44d3-acfb-29b94f21731c
Bailey, Alex
cd2762de-6a67-4ffc-ab42-2842ca378fa8

Renshaw, James and Bailey, Alex (2014) Covers of acts over monoids and pure epimorphisms. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 57 (3), 589-617. (doi:10.1017/S0013091513000618).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In 2001 Enochs' celebrated flat cover conjecture was finally proven and the proofs (two different proofs were presented in the same paper [5]) have since generated a great deal of interest among researchers. In particular the results have been recast in a number of other categories and in particular for additive categories (see for example [2], [3], [23] and [24]). In 2008, Mahmoudi and Renshaw considered a similar problem for acts over monoids but used a slightly different definition of cover. They proved that in general their definition was not equivalent to Enochs', except in the projective case, and left open a number of questions regarding the 'other' definition. This 'other' definition is the subject of the present paper and we attempt to emulate some of Enochs' work for the category of acts over monoids and concentrate, in the main, on strongly flat acts. We hope to extend this work to other classes of acts, such as injective, torsion-free, divisible and free, in a future report.

Text
covers_final.pdf - Author's Original
Download (380kB)

More information

Submitted date: 15 June 2012
Accepted/In Press date: 7 October 2012
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 April 2014
Published date: October 2014
Organisations: Pure Mathematics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 340579
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/340579
PURE UUID: e0648916-135c-4542-823d-638ec4c34291
ORCID for James Renshaw: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5571-8007

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jun 2012 13:06
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Renshaw ORCID iD
Author: Alex Bailey

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×