The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An international expert survey on functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

An international expert survey on functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
An international expert survey on functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Background. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is a key process in work disability (WD) management which aims to engage or re-engage individuals to work and employment. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Organization (WHO) can be interfaced with VR but there is a lack of evidence of what ICF contents experts in the field consider. The objective of this study is to survey the experts in the VR field with regard to what factors are considered important to patients participating in VR using the ICF as the language to summarize the results.

Methods. An internet-based survey was conducted with experts from six WHO Regions (Africa, the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific). Experts were asked six open-ended questions on factors that are important in VR. Each question was related to a component of the ICF (body functions, body structures, activities and, environmental factors, and personal factors). Responses were linked to the ICF.

Results. Using a modified stratified randomized sampling, 201 experts were sent the survey and 151 experts responded (75% response rate). We identified 101 ICF categories: 22 (21.8%) for body functions, 13 (12.9%) for body structures, 36 (35.6%) for activities and participation, and 30 (29.7%) for environmental factors.

Conclusions. There was a multitude of ICF functioning domains according to the respondents which indicates the complexity of VR. This expert survey has provided a list of ICF categories which could be considered in VR.
icf, vocational rehabilitation, survey, expert, work, employment
1053-0487
147-155
Escorpizo, Reuben
7c45c932-c7e1-4a15-b80e-376eebcfba48
Finger, Minika E.
a9dbd4b8-f5c4-4a28-b5b0-ece01d0f1f8e
Glässel, Andrea
6f16e387-6ce9-4b7b-a12b-1addef3bca23
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Escorpizo, Reuben
7c45c932-c7e1-4a15-b80e-376eebcfba48
Finger, Minika E.
a9dbd4b8-f5c4-4a28-b5b0-ece01d0f1f8e
Glässel, Andrea
6f16e387-6ce9-4b7b-a12b-1addef3bca23
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e

Escorpizo, Reuben, Finger, Minika E., Glässel, Andrea and Cieza, Alarcos (2011) An international expert survey on functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. [in special issue: Advancing the field of vocational rehabilitation with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health] Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21 (2), 147-155. (doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9276-y). (PMID:21152958)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is a key process in work disability (WD) management which aims to engage or re-engage individuals to work and employment. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Organization (WHO) can be interfaced with VR but there is a lack of evidence of what ICF contents experts in the field consider. The objective of this study is to survey the experts in the VR field with regard to what factors are considered important to patients participating in VR using the ICF as the language to summarize the results.

Methods. An internet-based survey was conducted with experts from six WHO Regions (Africa, the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific). Experts were asked six open-ended questions on factors that are important in VR. Each question was related to a component of the ICF (body functions, body structures, activities and, environmental factors, and personal factors). Responses were linked to the ICF.

Results. Using a modified stratified randomized sampling, 201 experts were sent the survey and 151 experts responded (75% response rate). We identified 101 ICF categories: 22 (21.8%) for body functions, 13 (12.9%) for body structures, 36 (35.6%) for activities and participation, and 30 (29.7%) for environmental factors.

Conclusions. There was a multitude of ICF functioning domains according to the respondents which indicates the complexity of VR. This expert survey has provided a list of ICF categories which could be considered in VR.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2011
Keywords: icf, vocational rehabilitation, survey, expert, work, employment
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341008
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341008
ISSN: 1053-0487
PURE UUID: ccbc2774-8c01-4b22-817d-5ef918a3cd88

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jul 2012 12:43
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Reuben Escorpizo
Author: Minika E. Finger
Author: Andrea Glässel
Author: Alarcos Cieza

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×