The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What is our knowledge of functioning and disability in hand conditions based on?

What is our knowledge of functioning and disability in hand conditions based on?
What is our knowledge of functioning and disability in hand conditions based on?
Objectives. To analyze the content of published studies on hand conditions using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference, and to highlight the most common aspects of functioning as well as those that deserve more consideration in research on hand conditions.

Data sources. The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched for English language studies on hand conditions published between 1998 and 2008.

Study selection. The identified studies were reviewed by 2 persons independently. Studies reporting firsthand data of patients with diseases/injuries of the hand and with a minimum sample size of 10 patients were included. Reviews, overviews, meta-analyses, and psychometric studies were excluded.

Data extraction. Peer review strategy was conducted in the data extraction process. Data from a random sample of 15% of the included studies was extracted by 2 reviewers independently.

Data synthesis. The search identified 18,861 citations. A random sample of 2782 (15%) abstracts was reviewed, leading to the inclusion of 471 publications. Preliminary included publications were reviewed in full-text, resulting in the final inclusion of 188 studies. The information obtained from the included studies was linked to 127 different second-level ICF categories. Second-level categories most frequently addressed in the studies were: health services, systems, and policies; sensation of pain and structure of upper extremity; mobility of joint functions; and muscle power functions.

Conclusions. The ICF provides a valuable reference to systematically analyze the content of published studies on hand conditions. Research activity needs to widen its focus on mental functions, further mobility functioning, self-care, and domestic life aspects, as well as environmental factors to encompass the impact of hand conditions on an individual's health. This would increase our knowledge on patients' needs and would help to ensure patient-oriented care.
classification, hand, rehabilitation, review
0003-9993
1326-1332
Kus, Sandra
a4e1eaa4-af3c-4623-a8d9-e3edf81d889c
van de Ven-Stevens, Lucelle A.
f650b8ac-07fd-430e-948d-730bd573d788
Coenen, Michaela
cbf780b8-d30a-4418-9f92-9b1f9c03cef7
Berno, Stephanie
2f578cc5-a8d1-4876-8e8f-a97452d10f41
Kollerits, Barbara
720e9d45-8d82-48a5-9cce-cae57388f636
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Kus, Sandra
a4e1eaa4-af3c-4623-a8d9-e3edf81d889c
van de Ven-Stevens, Lucelle A.
f650b8ac-07fd-430e-948d-730bd573d788
Coenen, Michaela
cbf780b8-d30a-4418-9f92-9b1f9c03cef7
Berno, Stephanie
2f578cc5-a8d1-4876-8e8f-a97452d10f41
Kollerits, Barbara
720e9d45-8d82-48a5-9cce-cae57388f636
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e

Kus, Sandra, van de Ven-Stevens, Lucelle A., Coenen, Michaela, Berno, Stephanie, Kollerits, Barbara and Cieza, Alarcos (2011) What is our knowledge of functioning and disability in hand conditions based on? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92 (8), 1326-1332. (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.009). (PMID:21658678)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives. To analyze the content of published studies on hand conditions using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference, and to highlight the most common aspects of functioning as well as those that deserve more consideration in research on hand conditions.

Data sources. The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched for English language studies on hand conditions published between 1998 and 2008.

Study selection. The identified studies were reviewed by 2 persons independently. Studies reporting firsthand data of patients with diseases/injuries of the hand and with a minimum sample size of 10 patients were included. Reviews, overviews, meta-analyses, and psychometric studies were excluded.

Data extraction. Peer review strategy was conducted in the data extraction process. Data from a random sample of 15% of the included studies was extracted by 2 reviewers independently.

Data synthesis. The search identified 18,861 citations. A random sample of 2782 (15%) abstracts was reviewed, leading to the inclusion of 471 publications. Preliminary included publications were reviewed in full-text, resulting in the final inclusion of 188 studies. The information obtained from the included studies was linked to 127 different second-level ICF categories. Second-level categories most frequently addressed in the studies were: health services, systems, and policies; sensation of pain and structure of upper extremity; mobility of joint functions; and muscle power functions.

Conclusions. The ICF provides a valuable reference to systematically analyze the content of published studies on hand conditions. Research activity needs to widen its focus on mental functions, further mobility functioning, self-care, and domestic life aspects, as well as environmental factors to encompass the impact of hand conditions on an individual's health. This would increase our knowledge on patients' needs and would help to ensure patient-oriented care.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 12 June 2011
Published date: August 2011
Keywords: classification, hand, rehabilitation, review
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341180
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341180
ISSN: 0003-9993
PURE UUID: 2c0a0bd6-1512-4e21-89ad-06dbdea26a4a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jul 2012 10:03
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandra Kus
Author: Lucelle A. van de Ven-Stevens
Author: Michaela Coenen
Author: Stephanie Berno
Author: Barbara Kollerits
Author: Alarcos Cieza

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×