The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health professional perspective on disability in head and neck cancer

Health professional perspective on disability in head and neck cancer
Health professional perspective on disability in head and neck cancer
Objectives. To evaluate problems after head and neck cancer (HNC) from the multidisciplinary team perspective; to classify the results using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); and to compare the results with a patient perspective.

Design. Internet-based survey.

Participants. There were 103 participants from 27 countries: 50 physicians (otolaryngologists, maxillofacial specialists, and radiation and medical oncologists) and 53 nonphysicians (dentists, psychologists, physiotherapists, speech swallowing therapists, nurses, and social workers).

Interventions. Health professionals involved in the treatment of HNC were asked about relevant problems. The survey was Internet based and included 5 questions, 1 for each of the ICF components: Body Functions, Body Structures, Activities and Participation, and contextual Environmental and Personal factors. Answers were translated into ICF categories by 2 independent researchers, and frequencies were calculated. The results were compared with the outcomes of patient interviews based on similar questions.

Results. A total of 3643 different answers translated into the ICF using 160 different second-level ICF categories. Less than 1% of answers were not covered by the ICF. There was high consistency in the ratings of food ingestion, pain, and the relevance of the immediate family. In general, health professionals tended to emphasize aspects of anatomical defects and body image, whereas areas of speech and exercise tolerance functions were more often named by patients.

Conclusions. The ICF seems to be a comprehensive tool for classifying problems after HNC from the multidisciplinary health professional perspective. There are important differences between the health professional and patient perspectives. We should be aware of this during cancer follow-up sessions and in the creation of rehabilitation plans.
0886-4470
576-583
Tschiesner, Uta
ed8dc63b-bb54-4124-a57a-92e22167a144
Becker, Sven
634e54de-9b25-4845-b808-de8e1cfdb1e2
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Tschiesner, Uta
ed8dc63b-bb54-4124-a57a-92e22167a144
Becker, Sven
634e54de-9b25-4845-b808-de8e1cfdb1e2
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e

Tschiesner, Uta, Becker, Sven and Cieza, Alarcos (2010) Health professional perspective on disability in head and neck cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 136 (6), 576-583. (doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.78). (PMID:20566908)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate problems after head and neck cancer (HNC) from the multidisciplinary team perspective; to classify the results using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); and to compare the results with a patient perspective.

Design. Internet-based survey.

Participants. There were 103 participants from 27 countries: 50 physicians (otolaryngologists, maxillofacial specialists, and radiation and medical oncologists) and 53 nonphysicians (dentists, psychologists, physiotherapists, speech swallowing therapists, nurses, and social workers).

Interventions. Health professionals involved in the treatment of HNC were asked about relevant problems. The survey was Internet based and included 5 questions, 1 for each of the ICF components: Body Functions, Body Structures, Activities and Participation, and contextual Environmental and Personal factors. Answers were translated into ICF categories by 2 independent researchers, and frequencies were calculated. The results were compared with the outcomes of patient interviews based on similar questions.

Results. A total of 3643 different answers translated into the ICF using 160 different second-level ICF categories. Less than 1% of answers were not covered by the ICF. There was high consistency in the ratings of food ingestion, pain, and the relevance of the immediate family. In general, health professionals tended to emphasize aspects of anatomical defects and body image, whereas areas of speech and exercise tolerance functions were more often named by patients.

Conclusions. The ICF seems to be a comprehensive tool for classifying problems after HNC from the multidisciplinary health professional perspective. There are important differences between the health professional and patient perspectives. We should be aware of this during cancer follow-up sessions and in the creation of rehabilitation plans.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2010
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341259
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341259
ISSN: 0886-4470
PURE UUID: a70f00d7-5212-4877-ae3a-9430f3138dfd

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jul 2012 12:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Uta Tschiesner
Author: Sven Becker
Author: Alarcos Cieza

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×