The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identification of similarities and differences in functioning in persons with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Identification of similarities and differences in functioning in persons with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Identification of similarities and differences in functioning in persons with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Objective: The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in functioning in AS and RA using the ICF as the framework for the description of functioning.

Methods: The Comprehensive ICF Core Sets for RA and AS were compared qualitatively regarding their content. A comparison study of common second-level ICF categories from both ICF Core Sets collected in two different cross-sectional studies in the Netherlands was performed. Significant differences regarding the level of impairments, limitations or restrictions were analyzed within the Mann-Whitney U-Test. To study whether the common ICF categories have different meaning for the two populations the Rasch model for dichotomous response option was used.

Results: The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for AS includes 74 ICF categories in 19 chapters and the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA includes 96 ICF categories in 22 chapters. Interviews among 87 patients with AS and 143 patients with RA on 24 of the common ICF categories revealed significant differences regarding the extent of problems. DIF analyses reflect that the meaning of some ICF categories, such as 'd410 Changing basic body positions' is different in relation to functioning depending on the health condition.

Conclusion: This study was the first to compare functioning in AS and RA based on the ICF. The results confirmed to a large extend the experiences well known from other studies and thereby showed that the ICF is useful to describe and compare functioning. Some aspects could be identified which are not easy to understand with existing evidence and need to be explained in the future.
rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, rehabilitation, outcome assessment
0392-856X
S92-S101
Rauch, A.
54f0b19a-a78d-4ad8-bc45-b3d32d3b60af
Cieza, A.
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Boonen, A.
939f0f30-960d-483e-aa0a-b972e178413b
Ewert, T.
eb1a87da-7df9-4113-a057-0801681d6724
Stucki, G.
a0a31092-5bde-4e54-a3b7-70427ac7923e
Rauch, A.
54f0b19a-a78d-4ad8-bc45-b3d32d3b60af
Cieza, A.
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Boonen, A.
939f0f30-960d-483e-aa0a-b972e178413b
Ewert, T.
eb1a87da-7df9-4113-a057-0801681d6724
Stucki, G.
a0a31092-5bde-4e54-a3b7-70427ac7923e

Rauch, A., Cieza, A., Boonen, A., Ewert, T. and Stucki, G. (2009) Identification of similarities and differences in functioning in persons with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [in special issue: A Systematic Comparison between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis] Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 27 (4), supplement 55, S92-S101. (PMID:19822053)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in functioning in AS and RA using the ICF as the framework for the description of functioning.

Methods: The Comprehensive ICF Core Sets for RA and AS were compared qualitatively regarding their content. A comparison study of common second-level ICF categories from both ICF Core Sets collected in two different cross-sectional studies in the Netherlands was performed. Significant differences regarding the level of impairments, limitations or restrictions were analyzed within the Mann-Whitney U-Test. To study whether the common ICF categories have different meaning for the two populations the Rasch model for dichotomous response option was used.

Results: The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for AS includes 74 ICF categories in 19 chapters and the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA includes 96 ICF categories in 22 chapters. Interviews among 87 patients with AS and 143 patients with RA on 24 of the common ICF categories revealed significant differences regarding the extent of problems. DIF analyses reflect that the meaning of some ICF categories, such as 'd410 Changing basic body positions' is different in relation to functioning depending on the health condition.

Conclusion: This study was the first to compare functioning in AS and RA based on the ICF. The results confirmed to a large extend the experiences well known from other studies and thereby showed that the ICF is useful to describe and compare functioning. Some aspects could be identified which are not easy to understand with existing evidence and need to be explained in the future.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009
Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, rehabilitation, outcome assessment
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341362
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341362
ISSN: 0392-856X
PURE UUID: 59e22c7e-2381-476a-88f0-ad2493c79fbc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jul 2012 10:40
Last modified: 07 Jan 2022 21:21

Export record

Contributors

Author: A. Rauch
Author: A. Cieza
Author: A. Boonen
Author: T. Ewert
Author: G. Stucki

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×