A cluster-randomised factorial trial of a primary care specialist genetics service
A cluster-randomised factorial trial of a primary care specialist genetics service
Background: General Practitioners (GPs) do not have the confidence to identify patients at increased genetic risk. A specialist primary care clinical genetics service could support GPs in referral and provide local clinics for their patients.
Aim: Cluster-randomised factorial trial of a primary care clinical genetics service, education to improve referral rate and clinics to improve the patient pathway.
Setting: 73 general practices in the South of England.
Methods: Practices randomised to receive case scenario based seminar (intervention) or not (control), and referred patients a primary (intervention) or secondary (control) care genetic counsellor-led appointment. Outcome measures: GP referral and clinic attendance rates (primary), appropriate cancer and case scenario referral rates, patient satisfaction, clinic costs, case management (secondary).
Results: 89 and 68 referrals made by 36 intervention and 37 control practices respectively. A trend towards an overall higher referral rate amongst educated GPs (referral rate ratio 1•34, 95% confidence interval, 0•89-2•02; P=0•161), they made more appropriate cancer referrals (referral rate ratio 2?36, 95% confidence interval 1•07-5•24; P=0•035). No indication of difference in clinic attendance rates (odds ratio 0•91, 95% CI 0•43-1•95; P=0•802) or patient satisfaction (P=0•189). Patients spent 49% less travelling (£3•60 versus £6•62; P=0•000) and took 33% less time (39•7 versus 57•7 minutes; P=0•000) to attend a primary than secondary care appointment. 83% of genetic counsellor managed appointments met the 18-week referral to treatment NHS target.
Conclusion: An integrated primary care genetics service both supports GPs in appropriate cancer referral and provides care in the right place by the right person.
Westwood, Greta Patricia
371469db-5598-4c81-95b6-c17a3ed228f8
Pickering, Ruth
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Latter, S.
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Gerard, Karen
1aef0321-add2-425f-8cd6-48f1adeef928
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Temple, Karen
d63e7c66-9fb0-46c8-855d-ee2607e6c226
March 2012
Westwood, Greta Patricia
371469db-5598-4c81-95b6-c17a3ed228f8
Pickering, Ruth
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Latter, S.
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Gerard, Karen
1aef0321-add2-425f-8cd6-48f1adeef928
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Temple, Karen
d63e7c66-9fb0-46c8-855d-ee2607e6c226
Westwood, Greta Patricia, Pickering, Ruth, Latter, S., Little, Paul, Gerard, Karen, Lucassen, Anneke and Temple, Karen
(2012)
A cluster-randomised factorial trial of a primary care specialist genetics service.
British Journal of General Practice.
Abstract
Background: General Practitioners (GPs) do not have the confidence to identify patients at increased genetic risk. A specialist primary care clinical genetics service could support GPs in referral and provide local clinics for their patients.
Aim: Cluster-randomised factorial trial of a primary care clinical genetics service, education to improve referral rate and clinics to improve the patient pathway.
Setting: 73 general practices in the South of England.
Methods: Practices randomised to receive case scenario based seminar (intervention) or not (control), and referred patients a primary (intervention) or secondary (control) care genetic counsellor-led appointment. Outcome measures: GP referral and clinic attendance rates (primary), appropriate cancer and case scenario referral rates, patient satisfaction, clinic costs, case management (secondary).
Results: 89 and 68 referrals made by 36 intervention and 37 control practices respectively. A trend towards an overall higher referral rate amongst educated GPs (referral rate ratio 1•34, 95% confidence interval, 0•89-2•02; P=0•161), they made more appropriate cancer referrals (referral rate ratio 2?36, 95% confidence interval 1•07-5•24; P=0•035). No indication of difference in clinic attendance rates (odds ratio 0•91, 95% CI 0•43-1•95; P=0•802) or patient satisfaction (P=0•189). Patients spent 49% less travelling (£3•60 versus £6•62; P=0•000) and took 33% less time (39•7 versus 57•7 minutes; P=0•000) to attend a primary than secondary care appointment. 83% of genetic counsellor managed appointments met the 18-week referral to treatment NHS target.
Conclusion: An integrated primary care genetics service both supports GPs in appropriate cancer referral and provides care in the right place by the right person.
Text
Westwood_et_al,_301011.pdf
- Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: March 2012
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 341365
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341365
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 235f8580-1be7-4d8f-a788-8fdf08c4f034
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Feb 2013 12:06
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:40
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Greta Patricia Westwood
Author:
Karen Gerard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics