The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A prospective case–control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life

Vaughan-Shaw, P.G., Cheung, T., Knight, J.S., Nichols, P.H., Pilkington, S.A. and Mirnezami, A.H. (2012) A prospective case–control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life Techniques in Coloproctology, 16, (5), pp. 355-362. (doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0851-4). (PMID:22777690).

Record type: Article

Abstract


Background: Conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) of the rectum is associated with higher circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, increased local recurrence, and reduced survival compared to anterior resection. A more radical extralevator APE (ELAPE) technique may improve oncological outcome. However, this technique may confer additional morbidity, and little comparative data on short-term outcomes have been reported. This study compares short-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after open and laparoscopic ELAPE, laparoscopic APE (LAPE), and open APE (OAPE).

Methods: Data on all ELAPE and 10 consecutive LAPE and OAPE were extracted from a prospective database. Perioperative care and follow-up were standardized. QOL was assessed using EORTC questionnaires.

Results: Sixteen ELAPE (14 laparoscopic), 10 LAPE, and 10 OAPE were included. Demographics, tumour stage, and neoadjuvant therapy use were comparable. Operative time was higher with ELAPE than LAPE and OAPE (295, 207.5, and 157.5 min, respectively, p = 0.01). A porcine collagen perineal mesh was used in 9 patients undergoing ELAPE but in no LAPE or OAPE patients. No difference in 30-day complications, re-admission, or length of stay was noted. ELAPE and LAPE were associated with earlier removal of urinary catheter (p = 0.02), yet other enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) parameters were equivalent. All ELAPE resections were R0 with no positive CRM identified. One LAPE and 2 OAPE were R1 resections. Analysis revealed no deterioration in QOL with ELAPE, with equivalent global health status.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that ELAPE is not associated with deterioration in short-term outcomes or QOL when compared with LAPE or OAPE.

PDF Mirnezami.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (204kB)

More information

Published date: July 2012
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341522
ISSN: 1123-6337
PURE UUID: eab7b47a-bd87-44bf-a89b-6eea3dbcabc6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2012 14:07
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.G. Vaughan-Shaw
Author: T. Cheung
Author: J.S. Knight
Author: P.H. Nichols
Author: S.A. Pilkington
Author: A.H. Mirnezami

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×