The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Content comparison of health-related quality of life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea

Content comparison of health-related quality of life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea
Content comparison of health-related quality of life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea
Background and purpose: Due to the increasing importance of quality of life assessments in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and due to an increased use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), for comparative purposes it is essential to understand the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments and the ICF. The purpose of this study was to compare the content covered by OSA-specific instruments using the ICF.

Patients and methods: OSA-specific instruments were identified, including the Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient-Oriented Severity Index, and the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire, and linked to the ICF by six health professionals according to standardized guidelines. The degree of agreement between health professionals was calculated by means of the kappa statistic.

Results: A total of 308 concepts were identified and linked to 78 different ICF categories; 35 categories of the component body function, one category of the component body structure, 38 categories of the component activities and participation, and four categories of the component environmental factors. Only contents within the chapters mental functions, mobility and social life were addressed by all instruments. Forty-seven categories were covered by only one instrument.

Conclusion: The ICF proved highly useful for the comparison of HRQOL instruments. This analysis may help researchers and clinicians to choose the most appropriate HRQOL instrument for a specific purpose as well as help to compare study outcomes of studies using different instruments for HRQOL assessment.
ICF, sleep, obstructive sleep apnea, health status, quality of life, disorders of excessive somnolence
1389-9457
199-206
Stucki, Armin
ca549860-ed6c-4aca-aee1-70f82d588f77
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Schuurmans, Macé M.
bdaa6232-1cec-49c5-af8c-a61b8c66305e
Ustun, Bedirhan
93920578-10fd-4376-a39d-3b018f6c1ef8
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Gradinger, Felix
78823651-e358-414b-86f5-6ad7b6088389
Partinen, Markku
ae2726c9-e991-4a6e-bd3a-c6dc208ea650
Stucki, Armin
ca549860-ed6c-4aca-aee1-70f82d588f77
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Schuurmans, Macé M.
bdaa6232-1cec-49c5-af8c-a61b8c66305e
Ustun, Bedirhan
93920578-10fd-4376-a39d-3b018f6c1ef8
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Gradinger, Felix
78823651-e358-414b-86f5-6ad7b6088389
Partinen, Markku
ae2726c9-e991-4a6e-bd3a-c6dc208ea650

Stucki, Armin, Cieza, Alarcos, Schuurmans, Macé M., Ustun, Bedirhan, Stucki, Gerold, Gradinger, Felix and Partinen, Markku (2008) Content comparison of health-related quality of life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Medicine, 9 (2), 199-206. (doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2007.01.020). (PMID:17644421)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and purpose: Due to the increasing importance of quality of life assessments in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and due to an increased use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), for comparative purposes it is essential to understand the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments and the ICF. The purpose of this study was to compare the content covered by OSA-specific instruments using the ICF.

Patients and methods: OSA-specific instruments were identified, including the Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient-Oriented Severity Index, and the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire, and linked to the ICF by six health professionals according to standardized guidelines. The degree of agreement between health professionals was calculated by means of the kappa statistic.

Results: A total of 308 concepts were identified and linked to 78 different ICF categories; 35 categories of the component body function, one category of the component body structure, 38 categories of the component activities and participation, and four categories of the component environmental factors. Only contents within the chapters mental functions, mobility and social life were addressed by all instruments. Forty-seven categories were covered by only one instrument.

Conclusion: The ICF proved highly useful for the comparison of HRQOL instruments. This analysis may help researchers and clinicians to choose the most appropriate HRQOL instrument for a specific purpose as well as help to compare study outcomes of studies using different instruments for HRQOL assessment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 17 July 2007
Published date: January 2008
Keywords: ICF, sleep, obstructive sleep apnea, health status, quality of life, disorders of excessive somnolence
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341584
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341584
ISSN: 1389-9457
PURE UUID: dabf8e14-2a68-4cce-a49f-29dfea97ce35

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jul 2012 12:03
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Armin Stucki
Author: Alarcos Cieza
Author: Macé M. Schuurmans
Author: Bedirhan Ustun
Author: Gerold Stucki
Author: Felix Gradinger
Author: Markku Partinen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×