Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission
Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission
This piece reflects on factors that affect the selection of regulatory options in the context of the work of a UK body that was not a ‘regulator’ in the sense of formally overseeing the activity of others. The Human Genetics Commission (HGC) did not directly wield legal power, but it had a recognised place in UK bioethical governance. It instigated legal interventions, such as the crime of DNA theft under the Human Tissue Act 2004. However, in other pieces of work different modes of regulation have emerged. It is necessary to consider the type of normative intervention that is ultimately most likely to promote the activities and behaviours that have been identified as desirable. Such regulatory strategies are sometimes obscured by the more explicit consideration of substantive issues in the final published reports. This piece considers how choices have been made about which options to pursue
978-0-19-965921-0
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
(2013)
Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission.
In,
Flear, Mark L., Farrell, Anne-Maree, Hervey, Tamara K. and Murphy, Therese
(eds.)
European Law and New Technologies.
Oxford, GB.
Oxford University Press.
(In Press)
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This piece reflects on factors that affect the selection of regulatory options in the context of the work of a UK body that was not a ‘regulator’ in the sense of formally overseeing the activity of others. The Human Genetics Commission (HGC) did not directly wield legal power, but it had a recognised place in UK bioethical governance. It instigated legal interventions, such as the crime of DNA theft under the Human Tissue Act 2004. However, in other pieces of work different modes of regulation have emerged. It is necessary to consider the type of normative intervention that is ultimately most likely to promote the activities and behaviours that have been identified as desirable. Such regulatory strategies are sometimes obscured by the more explicit consideration of substantive issues in the final published reports. This piece considers how choices have been made about which options to pursue
Text
Not_all_regulators_are_alike.pdf
- Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Accepted/In Press date: February 2013
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 341656
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341656
ISBN: 978-0-19-965921-0
PURE UUID: b4fc0786-95ac-42f9-9767-711939b24b7b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 13:24
Last modified: 12 Sep 2024 17:09
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Montgomery
Editor:
Mark L. Flear
Editor:
Anne-Maree Farrell
Editor:
Tamara K. Hervey
Editor:
Therese Murphy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics