The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission

Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission
Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission
This piece reflects on factors that affect the selection of regulatory options in the context of the work of a UK body that was not a ‘regulator’ in the sense of formally overseeing the activity of others. The Human Genetics Commission (HGC) did not directly wield legal power, but it had a recognised place in UK bioethical governance. It instigated legal interventions, such as the crime of DNA theft under the Human Tissue Act 2004. However, in other pieces of work different modes of regulation have emerged. It is necessary to consider the type of normative intervention that is ultimately most likely to promote the activities and behaviours that have been identified as desirable. Such regulatory strategies are sometimes obscured by the more explicit consideration of substantive issues in the final published reports. This piece considers how choices have been made about which options to pursue
978-0-19-965921-0
Oxford University Press
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Flear, Mark L.
Farrell, Anne-Maree
Hervey, Tamara K.
Murphy, Therese
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Flear, Mark L.
Farrell, Anne-Maree
Hervey, Tamara K.
Murphy, Therese

Montgomery, Jonathan (2013) Strategies of regulation: illustrations from the work of the Human Genetics Commission. In, Flear, Mark L., Farrell, Anne-Maree, Hervey, Tamara K. and Murphy, Therese (eds.) European Law and New Technologies. Oxford, GB. Oxford University Press. (In Press)

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This piece reflects on factors that affect the selection of regulatory options in the context of the work of a UK body that was not a ‘regulator’ in the sense of formally overseeing the activity of others. The Human Genetics Commission (HGC) did not directly wield legal power, but it had a recognised place in UK bioethical governance. It instigated legal interventions, such as the crime of DNA theft under the Human Tissue Act 2004. However, in other pieces of work different modes of regulation have emerged. It is necessary to consider the type of normative intervention that is ultimately most likely to promote the activities and behaviours that have been identified as desirable. Such regulatory strategies are sometimes obscured by the more explicit consideration of substantive issues in the final published reports. This piece considers how choices have been made about which options to pursue

Text
Not_all_regulators_are_alike.pdf - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Accepted/In Press date: February 2013
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341656
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341656
ISBN: 978-0-19-965921-0
PURE UUID: b4fc0786-95ac-42f9-9767-711939b24b7b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 13:24
Last modified: 12 Sep 2024 17:09

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jonathan Montgomery
Editor: Mark L. Flear
Editor: Anne-Maree Farrell
Editor: Tamara K. Hervey
Editor: Therese Murphy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×