The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups

Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups
Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups
Functioning is recognized as an important study outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA is an application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organisation with the purpose of representing the typical spectrum of functioning of patients with RA. To strengthen the patient perspective, persons with RA were explicitly involved in the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA using qualitative methodology. The objective of the study was twofold: to come forward with a proposal for the most appropriate methodology to validate Comprehensive ICF Core Sets from the patient perspective; and to add evidence to the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the perspective of patients. The specific aims were to explore the aspects of functioning and health important to patients with RA using two different focus group approaches (open approach and ICF-based approach) and to examine to what extent these aspects are represented by the current version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA. The sampling of patients followed the maximum variation strategy. Sample size was determined by saturation. The focus groups were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The meaning condensation procedure was used for the data analysis. After qualitative data analysis, the resulting concepts were linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Forty-nine patients participated in ten focus groups (five in each approach). Of the 76 ICF categories contained in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA, 65 were reported by the patients based on the open approach and 71 based on the ICF-based approach. Sixty-six additional categories (open approach, 41; ICF-based approach, 57) that are not covered in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA were raised. The existing version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA could be confirmed almost entirely by the two different focus group approaches applied. Focus groups are a highly useful qualitative method to validate the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the patient perspective. The ICF-based approach seems to be the most appropriate technique.
1478-6354
Coenen, Michaela
cbf780b8-d30a-4418-9f92-9b1f9c03cef7
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Stamm, Tanja A.
eca8e044-ac66-43fa-b5c0-e7a0c1b26420
Amann, Edda
44bcec24-f5ed-4b92-a14b-9d8963509af2
Kollerits, Barbara
720e9d45-8d82-48a5-9cce-cae57388f636
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Coenen, Michaela
cbf780b8-d30a-4418-9f92-9b1f9c03cef7
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Stamm, Tanja A.
eca8e044-ac66-43fa-b5c0-e7a0c1b26420
Amann, Edda
44bcec24-f5ed-4b92-a14b-9d8963509af2
Kollerits, Barbara
720e9d45-8d82-48a5-9cce-cae57388f636
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d

Coenen, Michaela, Cieza, Alarcos, Stamm, Tanja A., Amann, Edda, Kollerits, Barbara and Stucki, Gerold (2006) Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 8 (4). (doi:10.1186/ar1956). (PMID:16684371)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Functioning is recognized as an important study outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA is an application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organisation with the purpose of representing the typical spectrum of functioning of patients with RA. To strengthen the patient perspective, persons with RA were explicitly involved in the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA using qualitative methodology. The objective of the study was twofold: to come forward with a proposal for the most appropriate methodology to validate Comprehensive ICF Core Sets from the patient perspective; and to add evidence to the validation of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the perspective of patients. The specific aims were to explore the aspects of functioning and health important to patients with RA using two different focus group approaches (open approach and ICF-based approach) and to examine to what extent these aspects are represented by the current version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA. The sampling of patients followed the maximum variation strategy. Sample size was determined by saturation. The focus groups were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The meaning condensation procedure was used for the data analysis. After qualitative data analysis, the resulting concepts were linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Forty-nine patients participated in ten focus groups (five in each approach). Of the 76 ICF categories contained in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA, 65 were reported by the patients based on the open approach and 71 based on the ICF-based approach. Sixty-six additional categories (open approach, 41; ICF-based approach, 57) that are not covered in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA were raised. The existing version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA could be confirmed almost entirely by the two different focus group approaches applied. Focus groups are a highly useful qualitative method to validate the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA from the patient perspective. The ICF-based approach seems to be the most appropriate technique.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 9 May 2006
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341709
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341709
ISSN: 1478-6354
PURE UUID: 4fb08de8-418f-4d98-b8f6-2fc966a1cc18

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 13:37
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michaela Coenen
Author: Alarcos Cieza
Author: Tanja A. Stamm
Author: Edda Amann
Author: Barbara Kollerits
Author: Gerold Stucki

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×