Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the content covered by the North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument, the Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Methods: The linkage of items of the three measures to the ICF involved three steps, which were performed by two different health professionals and in which 10 different linking rules were applied.
Results: In the 48 items of the three instruments, a total of 123 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The concepts contained in the items were linked to 10 ICF categories of the component "body functions," 27 of the component "activities and participation," and 4 of the component "environmental factors." The estimated kappa coefficients ranged from 0.67 to 1.00.
Conclusion: Comparison based on the ICF provides insight into both the breadth of health dimensions measured as well as the thoroughness and depth of measurement. Therefore, it can be a useful tool when selecting specific measures for a study. Compared with other types of qualitative review, the most important advantage of the content comparison of measures based on the ICF is the use of an external and independent reference to which all the instruments can be linked and by which all the instruments can be compared. The three back-specific measures are comparable, with their common focus on physical aspects of body functions and activities and participation.
health-related quality of life, health status measures, low back pain, International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), linkage
147-153
Sigl, Tanja
d24f9af4-a89b-4af6-b982-d92c6e6d5c4d
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
February 2006
Sigl, Tanja
d24f9af4-a89b-4af6-b982-d92c6e6d5c4d
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Sigl, Tanja, Cieza, Alarcos, Brockow, Thomas, Chatterji, Somnath, Kostanjsek, Nenad and Stucki, Gerold
(2006)
Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
The Clinical Journal of Pain, 22 (2), .
(PMID:16428948)
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the content covered by the North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument, the Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Methods: The linkage of items of the three measures to the ICF involved three steps, which were performed by two different health professionals and in which 10 different linking rules were applied.
Results: In the 48 items of the three instruments, a total of 123 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The concepts contained in the items were linked to 10 ICF categories of the component "body functions," 27 of the component "activities and participation," and 4 of the component "environmental factors." The estimated kappa coefficients ranged from 0.67 to 1.00.
Conclusion: Comparison based on the ICF provides insight into both the breadth of health dimensions measured as well as the thoroughness and depth of measurement. Therefore, it can be a useful tool when selecting specific measures for a study. Compared with other types of qualitative review, the most important advantage of the content comparison of measures based on the ICF is the use of an external and independent reference to which all the instruments can be linked and by which all the instruments can be compared. The three back-specific measures are comparable, with their common focus on physical aspects of body functions and activities and participation.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2006
Keywords:
health-related quality of life, health status measures, low back pain, International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), linkage
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 341716
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341716
ISSN: 0749-8047
PURE UUID: 122d4e5c-fcfc-4cd0-ae9b-a3300a0d089e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 14:39
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 18:11
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Tanja Sigl
Author:
Alarcos Cieza
Author:
Thomas Brockow
Author:
Somnath Chatterji
Author:
Nenad Kostanjsek
Author:
Gerold Stucki
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics