The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository
Warning ePrints Soton is experiencing an issue with some file downloads not being available. We are working hard to fix this. Please bear with us.

Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the content covered by the North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument, the Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods: The linkage of items of the three measures to the ICF involved three steps, which were performed by two different health professionals and in which 10 different linking rules were applied.

Results: In the 48 items of the three instruments, a total of 123 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The concepts contained in the items were linked to 10 ICF categories of the component "body functions," 27 of the component "activities and participation," and 4 of the component "environmental factors." The estimated kappa coefficients ranged from 0.67 to 1.00.

Conclusion: Comparison based on the ICF provides insight into both the breadth of health dimensions measured as well as the thoroughness and depth of measurement. Therefore, it can be a useful tool when selecting specific measures for a study. Compared with other types of qualitative review, the most important advantage of the content comparison of measures based on the ICF is the use of an external and independent reference to which all the instruments can be linked and by which all the instruments can be compared. The three back-specific measures are comparable, with their common focus on physical aspects of body functions and activities and participation.
health-related quality of life, health status measures, low back pain, International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), linkage
0749-8047
147-153
Sigl, Tanja
d24f9af4-a89b-4af6-b982-d92c6e6d5c4d
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Sigl, Tanja
d24f9af4-a89b-4af6-b982-d92c6e6d5c4d
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d

Sigl, Tanja, Cieza, Alarcos, Brockow, Thomas, Chatterji, Somnath, Kostanjsek, Nenad and Stucki, Gerold (2006) Content comparison of low back pain specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The Clinical Journal of Pain, 22 (2), 147-153. (PMID:16428948)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the content covered by the North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument, the Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods: The linkage of items of the three measures to the ICF involved three steps, which were performed by two different health professionals and in which 10 different linking rules were applied.

Results: In the 48 items of the three instruments, a total of 123 concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The concepts contained in the items were linked to 10 ICF categories of the component "body functions," 27 of the component "activities and participation," and 4 of the component "environmental factors." The estimated kappa coefficients ranged from 0.67 to 1.00.

Conclusion: Comparison based on the ICF provides insight into both the breadth of health dimensions measured as well as the thoroughness and depth of measurement. Therefore, it can be a useful tool when selecting specific measures for a study. Compared with other types of qualitative review, the most important advantage of the content comparison of measures based on the ICF is the use of an external and independent reference to which all the instruments can be linked and by which all the instruments can be compared. The three back-specific measures are comparable, with their common focus on physical aspects of body functions and activities and participation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2006
Keywords: health-related quality of life, health status measures, low back pain, International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), linkage
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341716
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341716
ISSN: 0749-8047
PURE UUID: 122d4e5c-fcfc-4cd0-ae9b-a3300a0d089e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 14:39
Last modified: 08 Nov 2021 23:05

Export record

Contributors

Author: Tanja Sigl
Author: Alarcos Cieza
Author: Thomas Brockow
Author: Somnath Chatterji
Author: Nenad Kostanjsek
Author: Gerold Stucki

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×