The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update

Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update
Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update
The climate change that we are experiencing now is caused by an increase in greenhouse gases due to human activities, including burning fossil fuels, agriculture and deforestation. There is now widespread belief that a global warming of greater than 2°C above pre-industrial levels would be dangerous and should therefore be avoided. However, despite growing concerns over climate change and numerous international attempts to agree on reductions of global CO2 emissions, these have continued to climb. This has led some commentators to suggest more radical ‘geoengineering’ alternatives to conventional mitigation by reductions in CO2 emissions. Geoengineering is deliberate intervention in the climate system to counteract man-made global warming. There are two main classes of geoengineering: direct carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management that aims to cool the planet by reflecting more sunlight back to space. The findings of the review of geoengineering carried out by the UK Royal Society in 2009 are summarized here, including the climate effects, costs, risks and research and governance needs for various approaches. The possible role of geoengineering in a portfolio of responses to climate change is discussed, and various recent initiatives to establish good governance of research activity are reviewed.
Key findings include the following.

— Geoengineering is not a magic bullet and not an alternative to emissions reductions.

— Cutting global greenhouse gas emissions must remain our highest priority.

(i) But this is proving to be difficult, and geoengineering may be useful to support it.

— Geoengineering is very likely to be technically possible.

(i) However, there are major uncertainties and potential risks concerning effectiveness, costs and social and environmental impacts.

— Much more research is needed, as well as public engagement and a system of regulation (for both deployment and for possible large-scale field tests).

— The acceptability of geoengineering will be determined as much by social, legal and political issues as by scientific and technical factors.

Some methods of both types would involve release of materials to the environment, either to the atmosphere or to the oceans, in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The intended impacts on climate would in any case affect many or all countries, possibly to a variable extent. There are therefore inherent international implications for deployment of such geoengineering methods (and possibly also for some forms of research), which need early and collaborative consideration, before any deployment or large-scale experiments could be undertaken responsibly.
1364-503X
4166-4175
Shepherd, J.G.
f38de3ac-eb3b-403f-8767-c76be68d8bf2
Shepherd, J.G.
f38de3ac-eb3b-403f-8767-c76be68d8bf2

Shepherd, J.G. (2012) Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A, 370 (1974), 4166-4175. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0186).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The climate change that we are experiencing now is caused by an increase in greenhouse gases due to human activities, including burning fossil fuels, agriculture and deforestation. There is now widespread belief that a global warming of greater than 2°C above pre-industrial levels would be dangerous and should therefore be avoided. However, despite growing concerns over climate change and numerous international attempts to agree on reductions of global CO2 emissions, these have continued to climb. This has led some commentators to suggest more radical ‘geoengineering’ alternatives to conventional mitigation by reductions in CO2 emissions. Geoengineering is deliberate intervention in the climate system to counteract man-made global warming. There are two main classes of geoengineering: direct carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management that aims to cool the planet by reflecting more sunlight back to space. The findings of the review of geoengineering carried out by the UK Royal Society in 2009 are summarized here, including the climate effects, costs, risks and research and governance needs for various approaches. The possible role of geoengineering in a portfolio of responses to climate change is discussed, and various recent initiatives to establish good governance of research activity are reviewed.
Key findings include the following.

— Geoengineering is not a magic bullet and not an alternative to emissions reductions.

— Cutting global greenhouse gas emissions must remain our highest priority.

(i) But this is proving to be difficult, and geoengineering may be useful to support it.

— Geoengineering is very likely to be technically possible.

(i) However, there are major uncertainties and potential risks concerning effectiveness, costs and social and environmental impacts.

— Much more research is needed, as well as public engagement and a system of regulation (for both deployment and for possible large-scale field tests).

— The acceptability of geoengineering will be determined as much by social, legal and political issues as by scientific and technical factors.

Some methods of both types would involve release of materials to the environment, either to the atmosphere or to the oceans, in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The intended impacts on climate would in any case affect many or all countries, possibly to a variable extent. There are therefore inherent international implications for deployment of such geoengineering methods (and possibly also for some forms of research), which need early and collaborative consideration, before any deployment or large-scale experiments could be undertaken responsibly.

Text
Phil._Trans._R._Soc._A-2012-Shepherd-4166-75.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 13 September 2012
Organisations: Physical Oceanography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342022
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342022
ISSN: 1364-503X
PURE UUID: f16ba5d3-86bd-44e3-bfbb-b0a4bcc660cd
ORCID for J.G. Shepherd: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-4781

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2012 10:33
Last modified: 07 Aug 2019 00:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×