The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis : a way to specify functioning
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis : a way to specify functioning
Today, patients' functioning is a central issue in medicine. Concepts, classifications, and measurements of functioning and health, such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are of prime importance in clinical practice, teaching, and research. This report compares the contents of three of the most widely used health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), namely the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ), the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2), and the Short Form health survey (SF-36) based on the ICF. In addition, their content is compared to the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA. The comparisons illustrate that the different health status measures cover different components, and that they cover the different components with different level of precision. Using the ICF as a reference framework allows a researcher or a recommending instance to see which domains are covered in a specific instrument and, therefore, whether it is necessary to complement the study with other measures. Nevertheless, which specific health status measures to recommend still remains a challenge. If enough care is taken to define "what should be measured", it could form the basis for a solid and stable recommendation, adhered to for many years.
40-45
Stucki, G.
a0a31092-5bde-4e54-a3b7-70427ac7923e
Cieza, A.
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
November 2004
Stucki, G.
a0a31092-5bde-4e54-a3b7-70427ac7923e
Cieza, A.
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Stucki, G. and Cieza, A.
(2004)
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis : a way to specify functioning.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63, supplement 2, .
(doi:10.1136/ard.2004.028233).
(PMID:15479870)
Abstract
Today, patients' functioning is a central issue in medicine. Concepts, classifications, and measurements of functioning and health, such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are of prime importance in clinical practice, teaching, and research. This report compares the contents of three of the most widely used health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), namely the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ), the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2), and the Short Form health survey (SF-36) based on the ICF. In addition, their content is compared to the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for RA. The comparisons illustrate that the different health status measures cover different components, and that they cover the different components with different level of precision. Using the ICF as a reference framework allows a researcher or a recommending instance to see which domains are covered in a specific instrument and, therefore, whether it is necessary to complement the study with other measures. Nevertheless, which specific health status measures to recommend still remains a challenge. If enough care is taken to define "what should be measured", it could form the basis for a solid and stable recommendation, adhered to for many years.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2004
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 342076
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342076
ISSN: 0003-4967
PURE UUID: 215fe913-4f0b-4d48-bc3c-9f85dc98e681
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Aug 2012 15:41
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
G. Stucki
Author:
A. Cieza
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics