Whose credibility is it anyway: professional authority and relevance in forensic nurse examinations of sexual assault survivors
Whose credibility is it anyway: professional authority and relevance in forensic nurse examinations of sexual assault survivors
There is an inherent tension in the information gathering and recording stages of the forensic medical examination of rape survivors. Medical practitioners do not wish to record information that can undermine a complainant’s credibility, but at the same time must ensure that they do not problematise their own credibility by appearing partisan (for instance, by omitting information that might be relevant). Drawing upon semi-structured interviews with Forensic Nurse Examiners (FNEs) and their trainers (Forensic Medical Examiners) in England, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) in Ontario, this paper will investigate the strategies that both sets of nurses employ in order to document medical, sexual and assault histories, as well as physical phenomena (injuries, tattoos and piercings). FNEs collect more potentially prejudicial information than SANEs; this is a result of their greater anxiety in regards to their perceived credibility and professional authority.
110-120
Rees, Gethin
09ff9c1c-61ff-4ab1-b3b9-364ce4223d90
2012
Rees, Gethin
09ff9c1c-61ff-4ab1-b3b9-364ce4223d90
Rees, Gethin
(2012)
Whose credibility is it anyway: professional authority and relevance in forensic nurse examinations of sexual assault survivors.
Review of European Studies, 4 (4), .
(doi:10.5539/res.v4n4p110).
Abstract
There is an inherent tension in the information gathering and recording stages of the forensic medical examination of rape survivors. Medical practitioners do not wish to record information that can undermine a complainant’s credibility, but at the same time must ensure that they do not problematise their own credibility by appearing partisan (for instance, by omitting information that might be relevant). Drawing upon semi-structured interviews with Forensic Nurse Examiners (FNEs) and their trainers (Forensic Medical Examiners) in England, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) in Ontario, this paper will investigate the strategies that both sets of nurses employ in order to document medical, sexual and assault histories, as well as physical phenomena (injuries, tattoos and piercings). FNEs collect more potentially prejudicial information than SANEs; this is a result of their greater anxiety in regards to their perceived credibility and professional authority.
Text
19482
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2012
Organisations:
Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 342089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342089
ISSN: 1918-7173
PURE UUID: de2fbdc5-a771-49cc-bc28-e706a9386207
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Aug 2012 09:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gethin Rees
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics