The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Whose credibility is it anyway: professional authority and relevance in forensic nurse examinations of sexual assault survivors

Rees, Gethin (2012) Whose credibility is it anyway: professional authority and relevance in forensic nurse examinations of sexual assault survivors Review of European Studies, 4, (4), pp. 110-120. (doi:10.5539/res.v4n4p110).

Record type: Article

Abstract

There is an inherent tension in the information gathering and recording stages of the forensic medical examination of rape survivors. Medical practitioners do not wish to record information that can undermine a complainant’s credibility, but at the same time must ensure that they do not problematise their own credibility by appearing partisan (for instance, by omitting information that might be relevant). Drawing upon semi-structured interviews with Forensic Nurse Examiners (FNEs) and their trainers (Forensic Medical Examiners) in England, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) in Ontario, this paper will investigate the strategies that both sets of nurses employ in order to document medical, sexual and assault histories, as well as physical phenomena (injuries, tattoos and piercings). FNEs collect more potentially prejudicial information than SANEs; this is a result of their greater anxiety in regards to their perceived credibility and professional authority.

Other 19482 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (15kB)

More information

Published date: 2012
Organisations: Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342089
ISSN: 1918-7173
PURE UUID: de2fbdc5-a771-49cc-bc28-e706a9386207

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2012 09:49
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gethin Rees

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×