The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference

Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference
Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference
Objectives: To systematically identify and quantify the concepts contained in outcome measures in stroke trials using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials between 1992 and 2001 were located in MEDLINE and selected according to predefined criteria. Outcome measures were extracted and concepts contained in the outcome measures were linked to the ICF.

Results: A random sample of 160 (50%) of 320 eligible studies was included. A total of 148 standardized health status measures were identified. Of 11,283 extracted concepts, 91% could be linked to the ICF. The most used ICF categories for each component were d450 walking (70%) for activities and participation, b525 defecation functions (62%) for body functions, and e399 support and relationships, unspecified (30%) for environmental factors.

Conclusion: The ICF provides a useful reference to identify and quantify the concepts contained in outcome measures used in stroke trials. Outcome measurement in stroke refers to an enormous variety of concepts; for comparability of research findings agreement on what should be measured is needed.
1650-1977
56-62
Geyh, Thomas
f8a02f20-1df5-4984-9715-04afdaf43711
Kurt, Thomas
a479ae37-2b67-4841-8c7a-736e79fc1e11
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Ewert, Thomas
b99a8198-5c4f-485e-83c2-c4013b8e1aab
Omar, Zaliha
001bc755-afef-424a-851b-153036323860
Resch, Karl-Ludwig
2d770cd4-ecaf-4451-9e5b-de3537670077
Geyh, Thomas
f8a02f20-1df5-4984-9715-04afdaf43711
Kurt, Thomas
a479ae37-2b67-4841-8c7a-736e79fc1e11
Brockow, Thomas
72a8d26e-6a1d-4278-a62f-ad706dccf493
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Ewert, Thomas
b99a8198-5c4f-485e-83c2-c4013b8e1aab
Omar, Zaliha
001bc755-afef-424a-851b-153036323860
Resch, Karl-Ludwig
2d770cd4-ecaf-4451-9e5b-de3537670077

Geyh, Thomas, Kurt, Thomas, Brockow, Thomas, Cieza, Alarcos, Ewert, Thomas, Omar, Zaliha and Resch, Karl-Ludwig (2004) Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36, supplement 44, 56-62. (doi:10.1080/16501960410015399). (PMID:15370749)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically identify and quantify the concepts contained in outcome measures in stroke trials using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials between 1992 and 2001 were located in MEDLINE and selected according to predefined criteria. Outcome measures were extracted and concepts contained in the outcome measures were linked to the ICF.

Results: A random sample of 160 (50%) of 320 eligible studies was included. A total of 148 standardized health status measures were identified. Of 11,283 extracted concepts, 91% could be linked to the ICF. The most used ICF categories for each component were d450 walking (70%) for activities and participation, b525 defecation functions (62%) for body functions, and e399 support and relationships, unspecified (30%) for environmental factors.

Conclusion: The ICF provides a useful reference to identify and quantify the concepts contained in outcome measures used in stroke trials. Outcome measurement in stroke refers to an enormous variety of concepts; for comparability of research findings agreement on what should be measured is needed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2004
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342260
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342260
ISSN: 1650-1977
PURE UUID: e047bfdd-e049-4803-b723-4592f84700a1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Aug 2012 12:12
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Geyh
Author: Thomas Kurt
Author: Thomas Brockow
Author: Alarcos Cieza
Author: Thomas Ewert
Author: Zaliha Omar
Author: Karl-Ludwig Resch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×