The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

United Kingdom's open access policy urgently needs a tweak

United Kingdom's open access policy urgently needs a tweak
United Kingdom's open access policy urgently needs a tweak
The UK government, under the joint influence of the publisher lobby and short-sighted advice from Open Access (OA) advocates, has decided to make all UK research output OA within two years by diverting funds from UK research to pay publishers extra for (Gold) OA publishing, over and above what the UK (and the rest of the world) already pays publishers for journal subscriptions. This would merely be a needless waste of UK's scarce research funds in exchange for OA, instead of strengthening the UK's existing mandate for cost-free (Green) OA self-archiving. But the UK has also been persuaded to require researchers to pick and pay for Gold OA, instead of leaving the Green/Gold choice to them. This requirement needs to be dropped to prevent perverse consequences, both locally and globally, for both the UK and OA.
open access, rcuk, finch report, green open access, gold open access, open access mandates
1082-9873
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b

Harnad, Stevan (2012) United Kingdom's open access policy urgently needs a tweak. D-Lib Magazine, 18 (9/10), Autumn Issue. (doi:10.1045/september2012-harnad).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The UK government, under the joint influence of the publisher lobby and short-sighted advice from Open Access (OA) advocates, has decided to make all UK research output OA within two years by diverting funds from UK research to pay publishers extra for (Gold) OA publishing, over and above what the UK (and the rest of the world) already pays publishers for journal subscriptions. This would merely be a needless waste of UK's scarce research funds in exchange for OA, instead of strengthening the UK's existing mandate for cost-free (Green) OA self-archiving. But the UK has also been persuaded to require researchers to pick and pay for Gold OA, instead of leaving the Green/Gold choice to them. This requirement needs to be dropped to prevent perverse consequences, both locally and globally, for both the UK and OA.

Text
harnad-dlib12.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (125kB)

More information

Published date: September 2012
Keywords: open access, rcuk, finch report, green open access, gold open access, open access mandates
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342856
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342856
ISSN: 1082-9873
PURE UUID: 1b2f9a7a-f2ea-4550-aded-5f9f5987257a
ORCID for Stevan Harnad: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-1129

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2012 16:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Stevan Harnad ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×