The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Acupuncture for chronic pain: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials

Vickers, Andrew J., Cronin, Angel M., Maschino, Alexandra C., Lewith, George, MacPherson, Hugh, Foster, Nadine E., Sherman, Karen J., Witt, Claudia M. and Linde, Klaus (2012) Acupuncture for chronic pain: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials Archives of Internal Medicine, E1-E10. (doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654). (PMID:2965186).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Although acupuncture is widely used for chronic pain, there remains considerable controversy as to its value. We aimed to determine the effect size of acupuncture for 4 chronic pain conditions: back and neck pain, osteoarthritis, chronic headache, and shoulder pain.

Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for chronic pain in which allocation concealment was determined unambiguously to be adequate. Individual patient data meta-analyses were conducted using data from 29 of 31 eligible RCTs, with a total of 17 922 patients analyzed.

Results In the primary analysis, including all eligible RCTs, acupuncture was superior to both sham and no-acupuncture control for each pain condition (P < .001 for all comparisons). After exclusion of an outlying set of RCTs that strongly favored acupuncture, the effect sizes were similar across pain conditions. Patients receiving acupuncture had less pain, with scores that were 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13-0.33), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.25), and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.07-0.24) SDs lower than sham controls for back and neck pain, osteoarthritis, and chronic headache, respectively; the effect sizes in comparison to no-acupuncture controls were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.51-0.58), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.50-0.64), and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.37-0.46) SDs. These results were robust to a variety of sensitivity analyses, including those related to publication bias.

Conclusions Acupuncture is effective for the treatment of chronic pain and is therefore a reasonable referral option. Significant differences between true and sham acupuncture indicate that acupuncture is more than a placebo. However, these differences are relatively modest, suggesting that factors in addition to the specific effects of needling are important contributors to the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 10 September 2012
Published date: September 2012
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342868
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342868
ISSN: 0003-9926
PURE UUID: 5b40e420-0b30-4f58-8cdf-a74c625c8452

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Sep 2012 13:07
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:26

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew J. Vickers
Author: Angel M. Cronin
Author: Alexandra C. Maschino
Author: George Lewith
Author: Hugh MacPherson
Author: Nadine E. Foster
Author: Karen J. Sherman
Author: Claudia M. Witt
Author: Klaus Linde

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×