The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Varied and principled understandings of autonomy in English law: justifiable inconsistency or blinkered moralism?

Coggon, John (2007) Varied and principled understandings of autonomy in English law: justifiable inconsistency or blinkered moralism? Health Care Analysis, 15, (3), pp. 235-255. (doi:10.1007/s10728-007-0062-8). (PMID:17922200).

Record type: Article


Autonomy is a concept that holds much appeal to social and legal philosophers. Within a medical context, it is often argued that it should be afforded supremacy over other concepts and interests. When respect for autonomy merely requires non-intervention, an adult’s right to refuse treatment is held at law to be absolute. This apparently simple statement of principle does not hold true in practice. This is in part because an individual must be found to be competent to make a valid refusal of consent to medical treatment, and capacity to decide is not an absolute concept. But further to this, I argue that there are three relevant understandings of autonomy within our society, and each can demand in differing cases that different courses of action be followed. Judges, perhaps inadvertently, have been able to take advantage of the equivocal nature of the concept to come tacitly to decisions that reflect their own moral judgments of patients or decisions made in particular cases. The result is the inconsistent application of principle. I ask whether this is an unforeseen outcome or if it reflects a wilful disregard for equal treatment in favour of silent moral judgments in legal cases. Whatever the cause, I suggest that once this practice is seen to occur, acceptable justification of it in some cases is difficult to find

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: September 2007
Organisations: Southampton Law School


Local EPrints ID: 342960
ISSN: 1065-3058
PURE UUID: 22e407cc-d212-4275-bdd1-b74493c8fc0e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Oct 2012 10:39
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:26

Export record



Author: John Coggon

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.