Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?
Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?
This paper offers a critique of sociometrics as a ubiquitous method of measuring social relationships among children in social groups such as school classes. This is important in relation to disability politics and research as the apparently scientific measures are frequently used in the process of labelling children or predisposing the children involved, or others involved with them, to view disabled and other children in particular ways. We open a debate about judgements concerning whether the use of sociometric techniques needs to be better informed by questions about the underpinning normalising frameworks on which they depend, about the connotations of blame associated with particular sociometric statuses, and about the way that research constructs difficulties and reflects an adult agenda, marginalising the voices of (disabled) children. We argue for the value of the transactional turn in understanding the implications of this approach and for highlighting alternative perspectives.
1012-1023
Child, Samantha
135d08e1-eeeb-43d7-8662-aa5ed3a9b0b9
Child, Samantha
135d08e1-eeeb-43d7-8662-aa5ed3a9b0b9
Child, Samantha
(2012)
Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?
Disability & Society, 28 (7), .
(doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.741517).
(In Press)
Abstract
This paper offers a critique of sociometrics as a ubiquitous method of measuring social relationships among children in social groups such as school classes. This is important in relation to disability politics and research as the apparently scientific measures are frequently used in the process of labelling children or predisposing the children involved, or others involved with them, to view disabled and other children in particular ways. We open a debate about judgements concerning whether the use of sociometric techniques needs to be better informed by questions about the underpinning normalising frameworks on which they depend, about the connotations of blame associated with particular sociometric statuses, and about the way that research constructs difficulties and reflects an adult agenda, marginalising the voices of (disabled) children. We argue for the value of the transactional turn in understanding the implications of this approach and for highlighting alternative perspectives.
Text
Sociometrics_for_eprints.doc
- Author's Original
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 November 2012
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 343277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/343277
ISSN: 0968-7599
PURE UUID: 44922fba-33a4-4534-b9d1-468cb5e74824
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Oct 2012 14:21
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Samantha Child
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics