The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?

Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?
Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm?
This paper offers a critique of sociometrics as a ubiquitous method of measuring social relationships among children in social groups such as school classes. This is important in relation to disability politics and research as the apparently scientific measures are frequently used in the process of labelling children or predisposing the children involved, or others involved with them, to view disabled and other children in particular ways. We open a debate about judgements concerning whether the use of sociometric techniques needs to be better informed by questions about the underpinning normalising frameworks on which they depend, about the connotations of blame associated with particular sociometric statuses, and about the way that research constructs difficulties and reflects an adult agenda, marginalising the voices of (disabled) children. We argue for the value of the transactional turn in understanding the implications of this approach and for highlighting alternative perspectives.
0968-7599
1012-1023
Child, Samantha
135d08e1-eeeb-43d7-8662-aa5ed3a9b0b9
Child, Samantha
135d08e1-eeeb-43d7-8662-aa5ed3a9b0b9

Child, Samantha (2012) Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good - or yet more harm? Disability & Society, 28 (7), 1012-1023. (doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.741517). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper offers a critique of sociometrics as a ubiquitous method of measuring social relationships among children in social groups such as school classes. This is important in relation to disability politics and research as the apparently scientific measures are frequently used in the process of labelling children or predisposing the children involved, or others involved with them, to view disabled and other children in particular ways. We open a debate about judgements concerning whether the use of sociometric techniques needs to be better informed by questions about the underpinning normalising frameworks on which they depend, about the connotations of blame associated with particular sociometric statuses, and about the way that research constructs difficulties and reflects an adult agenda, marginalising the voices of (disabled) children. We argue for the value of the transactional turn in understanding the implications of this approach and for highlighting alternative perspectives.

Text
Sociometrics_for_eprints.doc - Author's Original
Download (79kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 November 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 343277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/343277
ISSN: 0968-7599
PURE UUID: 44922fba-33a4-4534-b9d1-468cb5e74824

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Oct 2012 14:21
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Samantha Child

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×