The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement in patients with arthritis of the hand: a meta-analysis

Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement in patients with arthritis of the hand: a meta-analysis
Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement in patients with arthritis of the hand: a meta-analysis
We systematically reviewed all the evidence published in the English language on proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) replacement, to determine its effectiveness on the function of the hand and the associated post-operative complications.

Original studies were selected if they reported clinical outcome with a minimum of one year’s follow-up. Quality was assessed using the Cowley systematic review criteria modified for finger-joint replacements. Of 319 articles identified, only five were adequately reported according to our quality criteria; there were no randomised controlled trials. PIPJ replacements had a substantial effect size on hand pain of -23.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) -27.3 to -19.1) and grip strength 1.2 (95% CI -10.7 to 13.1), and a small effect on range of movement 0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.8). A dorsal approach was most successful. Post-operative loosening occurred in 10% (95% CI 3 to 30) of ceramic and 12.5% (95% CI 7 to 21) of pyrocarbon replacements. Post-operative complications occurred in 27.8% (95% CI 20 to 37).

We conclude that the effectiveness of PIPJ replacement has not been established. Small observational case studies and short-term follow-up, together with insufficient reporting of patient data, functional outcomes and complications, limit the value of current evidence.

We recommend that a defined core set of patients, surgical and outcome data for this intervention be routinely and systematically collected within the framework of a joint registry.

0021-9355
1305 -1312
Adams, J.
6e38b8bb-9467-4585-86e4-14062b02bcba
Ryall, C.
1d050e52-3791-4fe2-bdbf-e2040b42617f
Pandyan, A.
3c730fee-f68d-40ff-b4f5-ca8f6f9a4811
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Stokes, M.
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
Bradley, S.
74f9e46e-c14a-4da6-82e0-5140ecdb3939
Warwick, David J.
29ed7ee4-e068-4935-9000-7b676ef21331
Adams, J.
6e38b8bb-9467-4585-86e4-14062b02bcba
Ryall, C.
1d050e52-3791-4fe2-bdbf-e2040b42617f
Pandyan, A.
3c730fee-f68d-40ff-b4f5-ca8f6f9a4811
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Stokes, M.
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
Bradley, S.
74f9e46e-c14a-4da6-82e0-5140ecdb3939
Warwick, David J.
29ed7ee4-e068-4935-9000-7b676ef21331

Adams, J., Ryall, C., Pandyan, A., Metcalf, Cheryl, Stokes, M., Bradley, S. and Warwick, David J. (2012) Proximal interphalangeal joint replacement in patients with arthritis of the hand: a meta-analysis Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, 94-B, (10), 1305 -1312.

Record type: Article

Abstract

We systematically reviewed all the evidence published in the English language on proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) replacement, to determine its effectiveness on the function of the hand and the associated post-operative complications.

Original studies were selected if they reported clinical outcome with a minimum of one year’s follow-up. Quality was assessed using the Cowley systematic review criteria modified for finger-joint replacements. Of 319 articles identified, only five were adequately reported according to our quality criteria; there were no randomised controlled trials. PIPJ replacements had a substantial effect size on hand pain of -23.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) -27.3 to -19.1) and grip strength 1.2 (95% CI -10.7 to 13.1), and a small effect on range of movement 0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.8). A dorsal approach was most successful. Post-operative loosening occurred in 10% (95% CI 3 to 30) of ceramic and 12.5% (95% CI 7 to 21) of pyrocarbon replacements. Post-operative complications occurred in 27.8% (95% CI 20 to 37).

We conclude that the effectiveness of PIPJ replacement has not been established. Small observational case studies and short-term follow-up, together with insufficient reporting of patient data, functional outcomes and complications, limit the value of current evidence.

We recommend that a defined core set of patients, surgical and outcome data for this intervention be routinely and systematically collected within the framework of a joint registry.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: September 2012
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences, Advancing Clinical & Expert Practice

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 343371
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/343371
ISSN: 0021-9355
PURE UUID: 7fddd740-05eb-4586-8af1-aa4dca516ff3
ORCID for Cheryl Metcalf: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-6066
ORCID for M. Stokes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-0890

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Oct 2012 15:20
Last modified: 10 Nov 2017 00:59

Export record

Contributors

Author: J. Adams
Author: C. Ryall
Author: A. Pandyan
Author: Cheryl Metcalf ORCID iD
Author: M. Stokes ORCID iD
Author: S. Bradley
Author: David J. Warwick

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×