Distinct work-related, clinical and psychological factors predict return to work following treatment in four different cancer types
Distinct work-related, clinical and psychological factors predict return to work following treatment in four different cancer types
Objective: any factors influence return to work (RTW) following cancer treatment. However specific factors affecting RTW across different cancer types are unclear. This study examined the role of clinical, sociodemographic, work and psychological factors in RTW following treatment for breast, gynaecological, head and neck, and urological cancer.
Methods: a 12-month prospective questionnaire study was conducted with 290 patients. Cox regression analyses were conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for time to RTW.
Results: between 89–94% of cancer survivors returned to work. Breast cancer survivors took the longest to return (median 30?weeks), and urology cancer survivors returned the soonest (median 5?weeks). Earlier return among breast cancer survivors was predicted by a greater sense of control over their cancer at work (HR 1.2; 95% CI: 1.09–1.37) and by full-time work (HR 2.1; CI: 1.24–3.4). Predictive of a longer return among gynaecological cancer survivors was a belief that cancer treatment may impair ability to work (HR 0.75; CI: 0.62–0.91). Among urological cancer survivors constipation was predictive of longer RTW (HR 0.99; CI: 0.97–1.00), whereas undertaking flexible working was predictive of returning sooner (HR 1.70; CI: 1.07–2.7). Head and neck cancer survivors who perceived greater negative consequences of their cancer took longer to return (HR 0.27; CI: 0.11–0.68). Those reporting better physical functioning returned sooner (HR1.04; CI: 1.01–1.08).
Conclusion: a different profile of predictive factors emerged for the four cancer types. In addition to optimal symptom management and workplace adaptations, the findings suggest that eliciting and challenging specific cancer and treatment-related perceptions may facilitate RTW
Cooper F., Alethea
695db282-400b-4c2f-b6d7-13f4c8edf564
Hankins, Matthew
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Rixon, Lorna
a9040465-4f96-4ed0-bcf9-7c0b306d311b
Eaton, Emma
21dd9a57-a79f-4dc7-8f67-6268d6393000
Grunfeld, Elizabeth A.
b5e30c33-ad17-4fc9-9be0-60fe557e2efb
Cooper F., Alethea
695db282-400b-4c2f-b6d7-13f4c8edf564
Hankins, Matthew
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Rixon, Lorna
a9040465-4f96-4ed0-bcf9-7c0b306d311b
Eaton, Emma
21dd9a57-a79f-4dc7-8f67-6268d6393000
Grunfeld, Elizabeth A.
b5e30c33-ad17-4fc9-9be0-60fe557e2efb
Cooper F., Alethea, Hankins, Matthew, Rixon, Lorna, Eaton, Emma and Grunfeld, Elizabeth A.
(2012)
Distinct work-related, clinical and psychological factors predict return to work following treatment in four different cancer types.
Psycho-Oncology.
(doi:10.1002/pon.3049).
(PMID:22434715)
Abstract
Objective: any factors influence return to work (RTW) following cancer treatment. However specific factors affecting RTW across different cancer types are unclear. This study examined the role of clinical, sociodemographic, work and psychological factors in RTW following treatment for breast, gynaecological, head and neck, and urological cancer.
Methods: a 12-month prospective questionnaire study was conducted with 290 patients. Cox regression analyses were conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for time to RTW.
Results: between 89–94% of cancer survivors returned to work. Breast cancer survivors took the longest to return (median 30?weeks), and urology cancer survivors returned the soonest (median 5?weeks). Earlier return among breast cancer survivors was predicted by a greater sense of control over their cancer at work (HR 1.2; 95% CI: 1.09–1.37) and by full-time work (HR 2.1; CI: 1.24–3.4). Predictive of a longer return among gynaecological cancer survivors was a belief that cancer treatment may impair ability to work (HR 0.75; CI: 0.62–0.91). Among urological cancer survivors constipation was predictive of longer RTW (HR 0.99; CI: 0.97–1.00), whereas undertaking flexible working was predictive of returning sooner (HR 1.70; CI: 1.07–2.7). Head and neck cancer survivors who perceived greater negative consequences of their cancer took longer to return (HR 0.27; CI: 0.11–0.68). Those reporting better physical functioning returned sooner (HR1.04; CI: 1.01–1.08).
Conclusion: a different profile of predictive factors emerged for the four cancer types. In addition to optimal symptom management and workplace adaptations, the findings suggest that eliciting and challenging specific cancer and treatment-related perceptions may facilitate RTW
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 March 2012
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 343730
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/343730
PURE UUID: b48914d1-a5d5-4e93-adfe-3981e1116dcf
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Oct 2012 08:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alethea Cooper F.
Author:
Matthew Hankins
Author:
Lorna Rixon
Author:
Emma Eaton
Author:
Elizabeth A. Grunfeld
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics