The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve

Record type: Article

Objective: to determine the sensitivity of conventional sensory assessment in monitoring lingual nerve recovery subsequent to third molar surgery and to evaluate if the assessment methods can be predictive of injury outcome.

Method: a prospective case series of 94 patients presenting with lingual nerve injuries evaluated using objective mechanosensory and subjective methods during the recovery period of up to 12 months.

Results: the conventional tests were often unable to diagnose the presence of injury due to variability and they were not predictive of outcome. As a result of this study, we are able to identify patients more likely to have permanent rather than temporary lingual nerve injury at four to eight weeks post injury, using patient reported subjective function. The subjective function test also minimises the requirements for specialist training or equipment providing an ideal method for general dental practice.

Conclusions: the development of these simple subjective tests may enable us to identify which patients are at risk of permanent lingual nerve injuries in the early post injury phase, thus allowing expeditious therapy when indicated

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Renton, T., Thexton, A., Crean, S.-J. and Hankins, Matthew (2006) Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve British Dental Journal, 200, (10), pp. 569-573. (doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813584). (PMID:16732250).

More information

Published date: May 2006
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 343934
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/343934
ISSN: 0007-0610
PURE UUID: d740e411-d710-4a1b-963a-9173874e1048

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Nov 2012 13:44
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T. Renton
Author: A. Thexton
Author: S.-J. Crean
Author: Matthew Hankins

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×