Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks
Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks
Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual separability and decisional separability) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of PI that remain undetected by marginal analysis.
Keywords: faces, configural processing, general recognition theory, face processing, inversion, perceptual independence.
456
Mestry, Natalie
7f725141-430d-4118-a43d-943f6bae787f
Menneer, Tamaryn
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Wenger, Michael, J.
718c9763-25e7-43c7-bac4-2b76abc24a55
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
15 November 2012
Mestry, Natalie
7f725141-430d-4118-a43d-943f6bae787f
Menneer, Tamaryn
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Wenger, Michael, J.
718c9763-25e7-43c7-bac4-2b76abc24a55
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Mestry, Natalie, Menneer, Tamaryn, Wenger, Michael, J. and Donnelly, Nick
(2012)
Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks.
Frontiers in Psychology, 3, .
(doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456).
Abstract
Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual separability and decisional separability) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of PI that remain undetected by marginal analysis.
Keywords: faces, configural processing, general recognition theory, face processing, inversion, perceptual independence.
Text
Mestry,_Menneer,_Wenger,_&_Donnelly_(2012).pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 15 November 2012
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 344293
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344293
ISSN: 1664-1078
PURE UUID: e9f225e0-72b5-4b1c-aef1-8147df25c34e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Oct 2012 09:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Natalie Mestry
Author:
Tamaryn Menneer
Author:
Michael, J. Wenger
Author:
Nick Donnelly
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics