The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks

Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks
Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks
Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual separability and decisional separability) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of PI that remain undetected by marginal analysis.

Keywords: faces, configural processing, general recognition theory, face processing, inversion, perceptual independence.
1664-1078
456
Mestry, Natalie
7f725141-430d-4118-a43d-943f6bae787f
Menneer, Tamaryn
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Wenger, Michael, J.
718c9763-25e7-43c7-bac4-2b76abc24a55
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Mestry, Natalie
7f725141-430d-4118-a43d-943f6bae787f
Menneer, Tamaryn
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Wenger, Michael, J.
718c9763-25e7-43c7-bac4-2b76abc24a55
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b

Mestry, Natalie, Menneer, Tamaryn, Wenger, Michael, J. and Donnelly, Nick (2012) Identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 456. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual separability and decisional separability) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of PI that remain undetected by marginal analysis.

Keywords: faces, configural processing, general recognition theory, face processing, inversion, perceptual independence.

Text
Mestry,_Menneer,_Wenger,_&_Donnelly_(2012).pdf - Other
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 15 November 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 344293
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344293
ISSN: 1664-1078
PURE UUID: e9f225e0-72b5-4b1c-aef1-8147df25c34e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Oct 2012 09:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Natalie Mestry
Author: Tamaryn Menneer
Author: Michael, J. Wenger
Author: Nick Donnelly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×