How patients choose osteopaths: a mixed methods study
How patients choose osteopaths: a mixed methods study
Objectives: To explore how patients choose individual osteopaths to consult; to test whether patients’ preferences for osteopaths depend on gender, the osteopath’s qualifications, and the cost of treatment; to explore patients’ perspectives.
Design. An explanatory mixed methods design incorporating a quasi-experimental study administered by postal survey and a qualitative interview study.
Setting. One sample of patients at a private-sector complementary therapy clinic in the UK completed a survey; a second sample of patients recruited from osteopathy clinics took part in qualitative interviews.
Main Outcome Measures. In the survey, male and female respondents (n=176) rated the likelihood of consulting each of 8 fictional osteopaths, representing all possible combinations of 3 factors (practitioner gender, biomedically qualified or not, working in a public sector or private clinic). Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n=19) about patients’ experiences of osteopathy were analysed deductively and inductively.
Results. Survey respondents preferred osteopaths who were also biomedical doctors, F(1,174) = 67.21, p<.001, ?2 = 0.28. Qualitative data showed that, when choosing an osteopath, patients valued personal recommendations from a trusted source and such recommendations overrode other considerations. First impressions were important and were based on patients’ perceptions of an osteopath’s competence, interpersonal fit, and immediate treatment effect.
Conclusions. Word of mouth appears to be the primary mechanism by which patients choose individual osteopaths; in the absence of personal recommendations, some patients prefer biomedically qualified practitioners. Trustworthy and appropriate information about practitioners (e.g. from professional regulatory bodies) could empower patients to make confident choices when seeking individual complementary practitioners to consult.
50-57
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Bradbury, K.J.
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Hj Jeludin, Nur Nadiah
02b805e0-4aee-41c6-871c-7995758863d1
Massey, Y.
28a5c9d8-0a65-45f0-85ac-4d0c3b899443
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
February 2013
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Bradbury, K.J.
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Hj Jeludin, Nur Nadiah
02b805e0-4aee-41c6-871c-7995758863d1
Massey, Y.
28a5c9d8-0a65-45f0-85ac-4d0c3b899443
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Bishop, Felicity L., Bradbury, K.J., Hj Jeludin, Nur Nadiah, Massey, Y. and Lewith, George T.
(2013)
How patients choose osteopaths: a mixed methods study.
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 21 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2012.10.003).
Abstract
Objectives: To explore how patients choose individual osteopaths to consult; to test whether patients’ preferences for osteopaths depend on gender, the osteopath’s qualifications, and the cost of treatment; to explore patients’ perspectives.
Design. An explanatory mixed methods design incorporating a quasi-experimental study administered by postal survey and a qualitative interview study.
Setting. One sample of patients at a private-sector complementary therapy clinic in the UK completed a survey; a second sample of patients recruited from osteopathy clinics took part in qualitative interviews.
Main Outcome Measures. In the survey, male and female respondents (n=176) rated the likelihood of consulting each of 8 fictional osteopaths, representing all possible combinations of 3 factors (practitioner gender, biomedically qualified or not, working in a public sector or private clinic). Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n=19) about patients’ experiences of osteopathy were analysed deductively and inductively.
Results. Survey respondents preferred osteopaths who were also biomedical doctors, F(1,174) = 67.21, p<.001, ?2 = 0.28. Qualitative data showed that, when choosing an osteopath, patients valued personal recommendations from a trusted source and such recommendations overrode other considerations. First impressions were important and were based on patients’ perceptions of an osteopath’s competence, interpersonal fit, and immediate treatment effect.
Conclusions. Word of mouth appears to be the primary mechanism by which patients choose individual osteopaths; in the absence of personal recommendations, some patients prefer biomedically qualified practitioners. Trustworthy and appropriate information about practitioners (e.g. from professional regulatory bodies) could empower patients to make confident choices when seeking individual complementary practitioners to consult.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 October 2012
Published date: February 2013
Organisations:
Primary Care & Population Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 344388
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344388
ISSN: 0965-2299
PURE UUID: ea8815c9-085b-4050-b6f7-5786314d3c96
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Oct 2012 14:06
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nur Nadiah Hj Jeludin
Author:
Y. Massey
Author:
George T. Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
