The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Which method predicts recidivism best?: A comparison of statistical, machine learning, and data mining predictive models

Tollenaar, N. and van der Heijden, P.G.M. (2012) Which method predicts recidivism best?: A comparison of statistical, machine learning, and data mining predictive models Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics, 176, (2), pp. 565-584. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01056.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Using criminal population conviction histories of recent offenders, prediction mod els are developed that predict three types of criminal recidivism: general recidivism, violent recidivism and sexual recidivism. The research question is whether prediction techniques from modern statistics, data mining and machine learning provide an improvement in predictive performance over classical statistical methods, namely logistic regression and linear discrim inant analysis. These models are compared on a large selection of performance measures. Results indicate that classical methods do equally well as or better than their modern counterparts. The predictive performance of the various techniques differs only slightly for general and violent recidivism, whereas differences are larger for sexual recidivism. For the general and violent recidivism data we present the results of logistic regression and for sexual recidivism of linear discriminant analysis.

PDF 113. Which method Predicts Best.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (349kB)

More information

Published date: 1 November 2012
Organisations: Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 344632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344632
ISSN: 0035-9254
PURE UUID: 561150cd-98fb-4ca9-b0d5-15a1a1fef0f6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Nov 2012 14:51
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N. Tollenaar

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×