The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness

Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness
Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness
We have now tested the Finch Committee's Hypothesis that Green Open Access Mandates are ineffective in generating deposits in institutional repositories. With data from ROARMAP on institutional Green OA mandates and data from ROAR on institutional repositories, we show that deposit number and rate is significantly correlated with mandate strength (classified as 1-12): The stronger the mandate, the more the deposits. The strongest mandates generate deposit rates of 70%+ within 2 years of adoption, compared to the un-mandated deposit rate of 20%. The effect is already detectable at the national level, where the UK, which has the largest proportion of Green OA mandates, has a national OA rate of 35%, compared to the global baseline of 25%. The conclusion is that, contrary to the Finch Hypothesis, Green Open Access Mandates do have a major effect, and the stronger the mandate, the stronger the effect (the Liege ID/OA mandate, linked to research performance evaluation, being the strongest mandate model). RCUK (as well as all universities, research institutions and research funders worldwide) would be well advised to adopt the strongest Green OA mandates and to integrate institutional and funder mandates.
open access, open access mandates, Finch Report, RCUK Open Access Policy, ROAR, ROARMAP, Open Access Policy, research assessment, institutional repositories, sprints
Gargouri, Y
0fbbef54-5a30-4432-bda4-d2dcb2a51ac5
Lariviere, V
66abc01d-4fc4-48e5-832b-acd2182907d9
Gingras, Y
54064330-b760-44ba-9a23-77f629c6f79b
Brody, T
6ddceeda-513c-49ae-b498-b0ad5ae5bdcc
Carr, L
0572b10e-039d-46c6-bf05-57cce71d3936
Harnad, S
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
Gargouri, Y
0fbbef54-5a30-4432-bda4-d2dcb2a51ac5
Lariviere, V
66abc01d-4fc4-48e5-832b-acd2182907d9
Gingras, Y
54064330-b760-44ba-9a23-77f629c6f79b
Brody, T
6ddceeda-513c-49ae-b498-b0ad5ae5bdcc
Carr, L
0572b10e-039d-46c6-bf05-57cce71d3936
Harnad, S
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b

Gargouri, Y, Lariviere, V, Gingras, Y, Brody, T, Carr, L and Harnad, S (2012) Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness At Open Access Week 2012.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

We have now tested the Finch Committee's Hypothesis that Green Open Access Mandates are ineffective in generating deposits in institutional repositories. With data from ROARMAP on institutional Green OA mandates and data from ROAR on institutional repositories, we show that deposit number and rate is significantly correlated with mandate strength (classified as 1-12): The stronger the mandate, the more the deposits. The strongest mandates generate deposit rates of 70%+ within 2 years of adoption, compared to the un-mandated deposit rate of 20%. The effect is already detectable at the national level, where the UK, which has the largest proportion of Green OA mandates, has a national OA rate of 35%, compared to the global baseline of 25%. The conclusion is that, contrary to the Finch Hypothesis, Green Open Access Mandates do have a major effect, and the stronger the mandate, the stronger the effect (the Liege ID/OA mandate, linked to research performance evaluation, being the strongest mandate model). RCUK (as well as all universities, research institutions and research funders worldwide) would be well advised to adopt the strongest Green OA mandates and to integrate institutional and funder mandates.

PDF finch2.pdf - Author's Original
Download (368kB)
Other finch2.docx - Author's Original
Download (258kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 26 October 2012
Venue - Dates: Open Access Week 2012, 2012-10-26
Keywords: open access, open access mandates, Finch Report, RCUK Open Access Policy, ROAR, ROARMAP, Open Access Policy, research assessment, institutional repositories, sprints
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 344687
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344687
PURE UUID: 618ac852-101e-41a1-bda9-69e1e16695a9
ORCID for L Carr: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-9680

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Oct 2012 16:24
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:14

Export record

Contributors

Author: Y Gargouri
Author: V Lariviere
Author: Y Gingras
Author: T Brody
Author: L Carr ORCID iD
Author: S Harnad

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×