Fair cuts? The impact of British public service pension reform on workers in the main occupations
Fair cuts? The impact of British public service pension reform on workers in the main occupations
Public service pensions have been a fundamental component of the British pension system in the post-war period and recent reform initiatives have caused political controversy. This article assesses the impact of the Conservative/Liberal government's public sector pension reform plans of 2011 for different public sector workers. It simulates their projected pension outcomes, assuming people contribute to the new system throughout their working lives. In particular, we examine the government's claim that the move away from final to average salary schemes will make pensions fairer for women and lower paid workers. The article shows that the reforms are indeed fair, if measured by the government's standards: retirement is delayed for all, but the lowest skilled and women lose least and some even gain higher pensions without paying proportionately more. Despite austerity, recent British pension reforms reflect a greater awareness of social inequality than many would expect and they have been built on more cross-party agreement than apparent at first sight.
public service pension reform, UK, fairness, pension outcomes, average salary schemes
1-18
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
22 October 2012
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
Bridgen, Paul and Meyer, Traute
(2012)
Fair cuts? The impact of British public service pension reform on workers in the main occupations.
Social Policy and Society, .
(doi:10.1017/S1474746412000541).
Abstract
Public service pensions have been a fundamental component of the British pension system in the post-war period and recent reform initiatives have caused political controversy. This article assesses the impact of the Conservative/Liberal government's public sector pension reform plans of 2011 for different public sector workers. It simulates their projected pension outcomes, assuming people contribute to the new system throughout their working lives. In particular, we examine the government's claim that the move away from final to average salary schemes will make pensions fairer for women and lower paid workers. The article shows that the reforms are indeed fair, if measured by the government's standards: retirement is delayed for all, but the lowest skilled and women lose least and some even gain higher pensions without paying proportionately more. Despite austerity, recent British pension reforms reflect a greater awareness of social inequality than many would expect and they have been built on more cross-party agreement than apparent at first sight.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 22 October 2012
Keywords:
public service pension reform, UK, fairness, pension outcomes, average salary schemes
Organisations:
Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 344857
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344857
ISSN: 1474-7464
PURE UUID: e8fc8c92-0a68-44d4-9624-db0dc1aae30b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2012 12:35
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics