The demographic impact of the First World War: an anthropometric perspective
The demographic impact of the First World War: an anthropometric perspective
During the 1970s and 1980s Jay Winter published a series of highly influential articles on the demographic impact of the First World War, culminating in his study of The Great War and the British People in 1986. Winter argued that the war led to a dramatic improvement in average living standards, and that the survival chances of most sections of the civilian population improved more rapidly than they might have done if peace had been maintained. This paper seeks to test the strength of Winter's hypothesis in three main ways. Section I examines the arguments which Winter himself put forward to support his view that the war led to unanticipated gains in the survival chances of older men, women, and infants. Section II focuses more directly on Winter's claim that the war led to a systematic erosion of pre-war differentials in infant mortality. Section III utilizes evidence relating to children's heights to examine the extent to which the war led to improvements in children's ‘nutritional status’. The paper's overall conclusion is that the war did not lead to any dramatic improvements in civilian health; the overall impression to be gained from an analysis of wartime health statistics is one of continuity rather than change.
343-366
Harris, Bernard
4fb9402b-64f0-474b-b41f-a9ca34d4ff50
1993
Harris, Bernard
4fb9402b-64f0-474b-b41f-a9ca34d4ff50
Harris, Bernard
(1993)
The demographic impact of the First World War: an anthropometric perspective.
Social History of Medicine, 6 (3), .
(doi:10.1093/shm/6.3.343).
Abstract
During the 1970s and 1980s Jay Winter published a series of highly influential articles on the demographic impact of the First World War, culminating in his study of The Great War and the British People in 1986. Winter argued that the war led to a dramatic improvement in average living standards, and that the survival chances of most sections of the civilian population improved more rapidly than they might have done if peace had been maintained. This paper seeks to test the strength of Winter's hypothesis in three main ways. Section I examines the arguments which Winter himself put forward to support his view that the war led to unanticipated gains in the survival chances of older men, women, and infants. Section II focuses more directly on Winter's claim that the war led to a systematic erosion of pre-war differentials in infant mortality. Section III utilizes evidence relating to children's heights to examine the extent to which the war led to improvements in children's ‘nutritional status’. The paper's overall conclusion is that the war did not lead to any dramatic improvements in civilian health; the overall impression to be gained from an analysis of wartime health statistics is one of continuity rather than change.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1993
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 34578
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/34578
ISSN: 0951-631X
PURE UUID: 3f8dd203-e23c-4c26-a4e1-94ac9dbfcd9b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Jan 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Bernard Harris
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics