The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice and future improvements

Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice and future improvements
Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice and future improvements
Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) is an important tool for conservation and achieving sustainable development. ‘Significant’ impacts are those which disturb or alter the environment to a measurable degree. Significance is a crucial part of EcIA, our understanding of the concept in practice is vital if it is to be effective as a tool. This study employed three methods to assess how the determination of significance has changed through time, what current practice is, and what would lead to future improvements. Three data streams were collected: interviews with expert stakeholders, a review of 30 Environmental Statements and a broad-scale survey of the United Kingdom Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM) members.

The approach taken in the determination of significance has become more standardised and subjectivity has become constrained through a transparent framework. This has largely been driven by a set of guidelines produced by IEEM in 2006. The significance of impacts is now more clearly justified and the accuracy with which it is determined has improved. However, there are limitations to accuracy and effectiveness of the determination of significance. These are the quality of baseline survey data, our scientific understanding of ecological processes and the lack of monitoring and feedback of results. These in turn are restricted by the limited resources available in consultancies. The most notable recommendations for future practice are the implementation of monitoring and the publication of feedback, the creation of a central database for baseline survey data and the streamlining of guidance.
ecological impact assessment (EcIA), environmental impact assessment (EIA), institute of ecology and environmental management (IEEM), environmental Statement, monitoring, significance
0195-9255
16-25
Briggs, Sam
87dbb154-5c39-473a-8121-c794487ee1fd
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Briggs, Sam
87dbb154-5c39-473a-8121-c794487ee1fd
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55

Briggs, Sam and Hudson, Malcolm D. (2013) Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice and future improvements. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 16-25. (doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.04.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) is an important tool for conservation and achieving sustainable development. ‘Significant’ impacts are those which disturb or alter the environment to a measurable degree. Significance is a crucial part of EcIA, our understanding of the concept in practice is vital if it is to be effective as a tool. This study employed three methods to assess how the determination of significance has changed through time, what current practice is, and what would lead to future improvements. Three data streams were collected: interviews with expert stakeholders, a review of 30 Environmental Statements and a broad-scale survey of the United Kingdom Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM) members.

The approach taken in the determination of significance has become more standardised and subjectivity has become constrained through a transparent framework. This has largely been driven by a set of guidelines produced by IEEM in 2006. The significance of impacts is now more clearly justified and the accuracy with which it is determined has improved. However, there are limitations to accuracy and effectiveness of the determination of significance. These are the quality of baseline survey data, our scientific understanding of ecological processes and the lack of monitoring and feedback of results. These in turn are restricted by the limited resources available in consultancies. The most notable recommendations for future practice are the implementation of monitoring and the publication of feedback, the creation of a central database for baseline survey data and the streamlining of guidance.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2013
Keywords: ecological impact assessment (EcIA), environmental impact assessment (EIA), institute of ecology and environmental management (IEEM), environmental Statement, monitoring, significance
Organisations: Civil Maritime & Env. Eng & Sci Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 345830
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/345830
ISSN: 0195-9255
PURE UUID: 5e2cc5e6-bc12-41cd-84a4-c722154fc2a1
ORCID for Sam Briggs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-8948

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Dec 2012 10:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×