Eliciting symptoms interpreted as normal by patients with early-stage lung cancer: could GP elicitation of normalised symptoms reduce delay in diagnosis? Cross-sectional interview study
Eliciting symptoms interpreted as normal by patients with early-stage lung cancer: could GP elicitation of normalised symptoms reduce delay in diagnosis? Cross-sectional interview study
Objectives: To investigate why symptoms indicative of early-stage lung cancer (LC) were not presented to general practitioners (GPs) and how early symptoms might be better elicited within primary care.
Design, setting and participants: A qualitative cross-sectional interview study about symptoms and help-seeking in 20 patients from three south England counties, awaiting resection of LC (suspected or histologically confirmed). Analysis drew on principles of discourse analysis and constant comparison to identify processes involved in interpretation and communication about symptoms, and explain nonpresentation.
Results: Most participants experienced health changes possibly indicative of LC which had not been presented during GP consultations. Symptoms that were episodic, or potentially caused by ageing or lifestyle, were frequently not presented to GPs. In interviews, open questions about health changes/symptoms in general did not elicit these symptoms; they only emerged in response to closed questions detailing specific changes in health. Questions using disease-related labels, for example, pain or breathlessness, were less likely to elicit symptoms than questions that used non-disease terminology, such as aches, discomfort or ‘getting out of breath’. Most participants described themselves as feeling well and were reluctant to associate potentially explained, nonspecific or episodic symptoms with LC, even after diagnosis.
Conclusions: Patients with early LC are unlikely to present symptoms possibly indicative of LC that they associate with normal processes, when attending primary care before diagnosis. Faced with patients at high LC risk, GPs will need to actively elicit potential LC symptoms not presented by the patient. Closed questions using non-disease terminology might better elicit normalised symptoms.
e001977-[12pp]
Brindle, Lucy
17158264-2a99-4786-afc0-30990240436c
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Corner, Jessica
eddc9d69-aa12-4de5-8ab0-b20a6b5765fa
Banerjee, Anindo
cbbef68b-3cef-42b2-86a4-2f94df3f1288
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
19 November 2012
Brindle, Lucy
17158264-2a99-4786-afc0-30990240436c
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Corner, Jessica
eddc9d69-aa12-4de5-8ab0-b20a6b5765fa
Banerjee, Anindo
cbbef68b-3cef-42b2-86a4-2f94df3f1288
Leydon, Geraldine M.
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Brindle, Lucy, Pope, Catherine, Corner, Jessica, Banerjee, Anindo and Leydon, Geraldine M.
(2012)
Eliciting symptoms interpreted as normal by patients with early-stage lung cancer: could GP elicitation of normalised symptoms reduce delay in diagnosis? Cross-sectional interview study.
BMJ Open, 2 (6), .
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001977).
(PMID:23166137)
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate why symptoms indicative of early-stage lung cancer (LC) were not presented to general practitioners (GPs) and how early symptoms might be better elicited within primary care.
Design, setting and participants: A qualitative cross-sectional interview study about symptoms and help-seeking in 20 patients from three south England counties, awaiting resection of LC (suspected or histologically confirmed). Analysis drew on principles of discourse analysis and constant comparison to identify processes involved in interpretation and communication about symptoms, and explain nonpresentation.
Results: Most participants experienced health changes possibly indicative of LC which had not been presented during GP consultations. Symptoms that were episodic, or potentially caused by ageing or lifestyle, were frequently not presented to GPs. In interviews, open questions about health changes/symptoms in general did not elicit these symptoms; they only emerged in response to closed questions detailing specific changes in health. Questions using disease-related labels, for example, pain or breathlessness, were less likely to elicit symptoms than questions that used non-disease terminology, such as aches, discomfort or ‘getting out of breath’. Most participants described themselves as feeling well and were reluctant to associate potentially explained, nonspecific or episodic symptoms with LC, even after diagnosis.
Conclusions: Patients with early LC are unlikely to present symptoms possibly indicative of LC that they associate with normal processes, when attending primary care before diagnosis. Faced with patients at high LC risk, GPs will need to actively elicit potential LC symptoms not presented by the patient. Closed questions using non-disease terminology might better elicit normalised symptoms.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 19 November 2012
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Primary Care & Population Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 346264
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346264
PURE UUID: c40d5579-927c-4cd9-83c8-215f320ec895
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Dec 2012 16:35
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Catherine Pope
Author:
Jessica Corner
Author:
Anindo Banerjee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics