China’s energy diplomacy: SOE relations in the context of global distribution and investment pattern
China’s energy diplomacy: SOE relations in the context of global distribution and investment pattern
This article addresses the mercantilist connotations of China’s energy diplomacy through empirical and quantitative approaches by arguing that: firstly, the economic logic motivating Chinese enterprises is not the key variable in the formulation of foreign investment decisions; secondly, the energy security policies of the Chinese government are key variables which decide the distribution of SOEs’ foreign investment; thirdly, China’s energy diplomacy is mercantilist in nature due to the weakness of its SOEs in the structure of the international market; finally, under the premise of satisfying its government’s energy security policy, SOEs have autonomy in their approaches to investment. Therefore, it may be reasoned that under specific conditions, mercantilism and liberalism can both explain China’s energy diplomacy. This article provides compelling evidence supporting this reasoning, through analyzing cases studies in the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa
325-343
Yeh, Hui-Chi
6eb6a48e-5cb9-4ff8-9e56-48744b0a33be
Yu, Chi-Wei
68bc9c8e-2389-4a72-84f9-d54c435b941a
December 2012
Yeh, Hui-Chi
6eb6a48e-5cb9-4ff8-9e56-48744b0a33be
Yu, Chi-Wei
68bc9c8e-2389-4a72-84f9-d54c435b941a
Yeh, Hui-Chi and Yu, Chi-Wei
(2012)
China’s energy diplomacy: SOE relations in the context of global distribution and investment pattern.
Advances in Applied Sociology, 4 (2), .
(doi:10.4236/aasoci.2012.24043).
Abstract
This article addresses the mercantilist connotations of China’s energy diplomacy through empirical and quantitative approaches by arguing that: firstly, the economic logic motivating Chinese enterprises is not the key variable in the formulation of foreign investment decisions; secondly, the energy security policies of the Chinese government are key variables which decide the distribution of SOEs’ foreign investment; thirdly, China’s energy diplomacy is mercantilist in nature due to the weakness of its SOEs in the structure of the international market; finally, under the premise of satisfying its government’s energy security policy, SOEs have autonomy in their approaches to investment. Therefore, it may be reasoned that under specific conditions, mercantilism and liberalism can both explain China’s energy diplomacy. This article provides compelling evidence supporting this reasoning, through analyzing cases studies in the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa
Text
AASoci20120400013_48158090.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: December 2012
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 346616
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346616
ISSN: 2165-4328
PURE UUID: a96ff4b5-d095-4a6d-a085-9d7456437adf
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jan 2013 09:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Hui-Chi Yeh
Author:
Chi-Wei Yu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics