The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces

Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces
Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces
Glossy and matte objects can be differentiated using specular highlights: bright patches in the retinal image produced when light rays are reflected regularly from smooth surfaces. However, bright patches also occur on matte objects, due to local illumination or reflectance changes. Binocular vision provides information that could distinguish specular highlights from other luminance discontinuities; unlike surface markings, specular highlights lie not at the surface depth, but ‘‘float’’ in front of concave surfaces and behind convex ones. We ask whether observers implicitly understand and exploit the peculiarities of specular geometry for gloss and shape perception. Our participants judged the glossiness and shape of curved surfaces that included specular highlights at various depths. Observers demonstrated substantial deviations from a full geometric model of specular reflection. Concave surfaces appeared glossy both when highlights lay in front of and (incorrectly) behind the surface. Failings in the interpretation of monocular highlights were also apparent. Highlight disparity had no effect on shape perception. However, the perceived gloss of convex surfaces did follow geometric constraints: only highlights at appropriate depths produced high gloss ratings. We suggest, in contrast with previous work, that the visual system invokes simple heuristics as gloss indicators to accommodate complex reflections and inter-reflections that occur particularly inside concavities.
material perception, 3D surface and shape perception, crossmodal perception, gloss and specular highlights, binocular vision
1534-7362
9-[10pp]
Kerrigan, Iona S
5d9af8d5-a987-4603-a26c-6c5adefbdf91
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Kerrigan, Iona S
5d9af8d5-a987-4603-a26c-6c5adefbdf91
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688

Kerrigan, Iona S and Adams, Wendy J. (2013) Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces Journal of Vision, 13, (1), 9-[10pp]. (doi:10.1167/13.1.9). (PMID:23291649).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Glossy and matte objects can be differentiated using specular highlights: bright patches in the retinal image produced when light rays are reflected regularly from smooth surfaces. However, bright patches also occur on matte objects, due to local illumination or reflectance changes. Binocular vision provides information that could distinguish specular highlights from other luminance discontinuities; unlike surface markings, specular highlights lie not at the surface depth, but ‘‘float’’ in front of concave surfaces and behind convex ones. We ask whether observers implicitly understand and exploit the peculiarities of specular geometry for gloss and shape perception. Our participants judged the glossiness and shape of curved surfaces that included specular highlights at various depths. Observers demonstrated substantial deviations from a full geometric model of specular reflection. Concave surfaces appeared glossy both when highlights lay in front of and (incorrectly) behind the surface. Failings in the interpretation of monocular highlights were also apparent. Highlight disparity had no effect on shape perception. However, the perceived gloss of convex surfaces did follow geometric constraints: only highlights at appropriate depths produced high gloss ratings. We suggest, in contrast with previous work, that the visual system invokes simple heuristics as gloss indicators to accommodate complex reflections and inter-reflections that occur particularly inside concavities.

PDF KerriganAdamsJoV2013.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (666kB)

More information

Published date: 4 January 2013
Keywords: material perception, 3D surface and shape perception, crossmodal perception, gloss and specular highlights, binocular vision
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 346722
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346722
ISSN: 1534-7362
PURE UUID: d72ac5b0-fb14-4ac6-a950-cccc719ce536
ORCID for Wendy J. Adams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-1056

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2013 12:43
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Iona S Kerrigan
Author: Wendy J. Adams ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×