Obesity comorbidity in unipopular major depressive disorder: refining the core phenotype
Obesity comorbidity in unipopular major depressive disorder: refining the core phenotype
Objective: While a significant body of research has demonstrated high comorbidity rates between depression and obesity, the vast majority of this work has considered depression as a unitary diagnosis. Given that increased appetite and weight gain are highly characteristic of the “atypical” subtype of depression, while classic depression is characterized by decreased appetite and weight loss, it would be important to examine whether increased obesity risk is consistent across the major vegetative subtypes of depression or is limited to the atypical subtype.
Method: Using data from the 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), we identified 5,092 US adults with past or current major depression based on DSM-IV-TR criteria and 1,500 gender-matched controls. Each depressed subject was designated as having classic, atypical, or undifferentiated depression based on core vegetative symptoms. Logistic regression models examined rates of current obesity (defined as a current body mass index [kg/m2] > 30) across the 3 depressive subgroups and nondepressed controls, adjusting for demographic differences. To limit the possible effect of current depressive symptoms on observed obesity rates, secondary analyses were completed in individuals with past depression only.
Results: Subjects with atypical depression had markedly elevated obesity rates compared to population controls and to other depressed subjects, with corresponding pairwise odds ratios consistently greater than 2.0 (P < .001). In contrast, obesity rates were not significantly different in subjects with classic depression and nondepressed controls. These results were manifest in individuals with either current or past depression and were independent of gender and age.
Conclusions: While many individuals with classic depression will present with obesity due to the high prevalence of both disorders, only atypical depression is associated with an elevated risk of obesity relative to the population at large. Refining the target phenotype(s) for future work on depression and obesity might improve our understanding, prevention, and treatment of this complex clinical problem.
1119-1124
Levitan, Robert D.
4d47c2b1-f802-4a93-9bbc-a15c92167add
Davis, Caroline
206d720f-a96e-4623-8e53-e42a87718a71
Kaplan, Alan S.
21ee7c24-0b66-4bcb-8a49-e43367b89e87
Arenovich, Tamara
fa9c35a8-ef47-4162-bf49-55f771399dbf
Phillips, D.I.W.
29b73be7-2ff9-4fff-ae42-d59842df4cc6
Ravindran, Arun V.
22d67e86-5a23-49e5-ab9c-04706d2a47e7
August 2012
Levitan, Robert D.
4d47c2b1-f802-4a93-9bbc-a15c92167add
Davis, Caroline
206d720f-a96e-4623-8e53-e42a87718a71
Kaplan, Alan S.
21ee7c24-0b66-4bcb-8a49-e43367b89e87
Arenovich, Tamara
fa9c35a8-ef47-4162-bf49-55f771399dbf
Phillips, D.I.W.
29b73be7-2ff9-4fff-ae42-d59842df4cc6
Ravindran, Arun V.
22d67e86-5a23-49e5-ab9c-04706d2a47e7
Levitan, Robert D., Davis, Caroline, Kaplan, Alan S., Arenovich, Tamara, Phillips, D.I.W. and Ravindran, Arun V.
(2012)
Obesity comorbidity in unipopular major depressive disorder: refining the core phenotype.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 73 (8), .
(doi:10.4088/JCP.11m07394).
(PMID:22687640)
Abstract
Objective: While a significant body of research has demonstrated high comorbidity rates between depression and obesity, the vast majority of this work has considered depression as a unitary diagnosis. Given that increased appetite and weight gain are highly characteristic of the “atypical” subtype of depression, while classic depression is characterized by decreased appetite and weight loss, it would be important to examine whether increased obesity risk is consistent across the major vegetative subtypes of depression or is limited to the atypical subtype.
Method: Using data from the 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), we identified 5,092 US adults with past or current major depression based on DSM-IV-TR criteria and 1,500 gender-matched controls. Each depressed subject was designated as having classic, atypical, or undifferentiated depression based on core vegetative symptoms. Logistic regression models examined rates of current obesity (defined as a current body mass index [kg/m2] > 30) across the 3 depressive subgroups and nondepressed controls, adjusting for demographic differences. To limit the possible effect of current depressive symptoms on observed obesity rates, secondary analyses were completed in individuals with past depression only.
Results: Subjects with atypical depression had markedly elevated obesity rates compared to population controls and to other depressed subjects, with corresponding pairwise odds ratios consistently greater than 2.0 (P < .001). In contrast, obesity rates were not significantly different in subjects with classic depression and nondepressed controls. These results were manifest in individuals with either current or past depression and were independent of gender and age.
Conclusions: While many individuals with classic depression will present with obesity due to the high prevalence of both disorders, only atypical depression is associated with an elevated risk of obesity relative to the population at large. Refining the target phenotype(s) for future work on depression and obesity might improve our understanding, prevention, and treatment of this complex clinical problem.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 May 2012
Published date: August 2012
Organisations:
Faculty of Medicine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 346855
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346855
PURE UUID: a46f17aa-a7b7-4a3a-909f-5dfe5a07579a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jan 2013 10:24
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Robert D. Levitan
Author:
Caroline Davis
Author:
Alan S. Kaplan
Author:
Tamara Arenovich
Author:
D.I.W. Phillips
Author:
Arun V. Ravindran
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics