Use of the lymphocyte count as a diagnostic screen in adults with suspected Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis
Use of the lymphocyte count as a diagnostic screen in adults with suspected Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis
Objective: To evaluate the predictive diagnostic accuracy of the lymphocyte count in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-related infectious mononucleosis (IM).
Study Design: Retrospective case note and blood results review within a University-affiliated teaching hospital.
Method: A retrospective review of 726 patients undergoing full blood count and Monospot testing was undertaken. Monospot testing outcomes were compared with the lymphocyte count examining for significant statistical correlations.
Results: With a lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L, 99% of patients had an associated negative Monospot result (sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 94%). A group sub-analysis of the over 18s population with a lymphocyte count ?4 x 109/L revealed that 100% were Monospot negative (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97%). A lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L correlated significantly with a negative Monospot result.
Conclusion: A lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L appears to be a highly reliable predictor of a negative Monospot result, particularly in the over 18s population. Paediatric patients, and adults with strongly suggestive symptoms and signs of IM, should still undergo Monospot testing. However in adults with more subtle symptoms and signs, representing the vast majority, Monospot testing should be restricted to those with a lymphocyte count >4 x 109?L.
Biggs, T.
f9b3cb2c-bd3d-43ef-87f3-c6ede41142f8
Hayes, S.M.
b966466b-e52e-43f8-9cc5-ab20b3534197
Bird, J.
14330393-cdb9-4395-9ba0-ee03cab3f16b
Harries, P
5973cdaa-fb80-498b-b9af-d0f5b59ab8e0
Salib, R.J.
d6fde1c1-5b5e-43f7-ae1c-42cce6a0c9fc
Biggs, T.
f9b3cb2c-bd3d-43ef-87f3-c6ede41142f8
Hayes, S.M.
b966466b-e52e-43f8-9cc5-ab20b3534197
Bird, J.
14330393-cdb9-4395-9ba0-ee03cab3f16b
Harries, P
5973cdaa-fb80-498b-b9af-d0f5b59ab8e0
Salib, R.J.
d6fde1c1-5b5e-43f7-ae1c-42cce6a0c9fc
Biggs, T., Hayes, S.M., Bird, J., Harries, P and Salib, R.J.
(2013)
Use of the lymphocyte count as a diagnostic screen in adults with suspected Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis.
The Laryngoscope.
(In Press)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the predictive diagnostic accuracy of the lymphocyte count in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-related infectious mononucleosis (IM).
Study Design: Retrospective case note and blood results review within a University-affiliated teaching hospital.
Method: A retrospective review of 726 patients undergoing full blood count and Monospot testing was undertaken. Monospot testing outcomes were compared with the lymphocyte count examining for significant statistical correlations.
Results: With a lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L, 99% of patients had an associated negative Monospot result (sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 94%). A group sub-analysis of the over 18s population with a lymphocyte count ?4 x 109/L revealed that 100% were Monospot negative (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97%). A lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L correlated significantly with a negative Monospot result.
Conclusion: A lymphocyte count of ?4 x 109/L appears to be a highly reliable predictor of a negative Monospot result, particularly in the over 18s population. Paediatric patients, and adults with strongly suggestive symptoms and signs of IM, should still undergo Monospot testing. However in adults with more subtle symptoms and signs, representing the vast majority, Monospot testing should be restricted to those with a lymphocyte count >4 x 109?L.
Text
Revised unmarked final version.doc
- Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2013
Organisations:
Faculty of Medicine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 346984
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346984
ISSN: 0023-852X
PURE UUID: 89d57ce8-ccb6-49ae-a921-8a28c2350a9c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Jan 2013 14:55
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:14
Export record
Contributors
Author:
T. Biggs
Author:
S.M. Hayes
Author:
J. Bird
Author:
P Harries
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics