The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Developing clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a mixed-method modified Delphi study

Developing clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a mixed-method modified Delphi study
Developing clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a mixed-method modified Delphi study
Background: polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common female reproductive endocrine disorder, affecting 6–18% of women of reproductive age. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is gaining popularity in the UK and has been historically effective for symptoms of PCOS. However, it remains unclear what constitutes routine clinical practice in CHM in order to conduct further rigorous research.

Aim: the aim of this study was to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of PCOS using CHM.

Method: following a modified Delphi method, CHM practitioners were purposively sampled and interviewed to explore their views on CHM prescribing for PCOS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic and framework analysis was applied to transcriptions to formulate statements of key clinical practice points. These statements were distributed via an online questionnaire to the same herbalists who were invited to rate their agreement with each statement on a 7-point Likert scale. Group consensus on a statement was defined a priori as a median Likert score of 5 or more. Questionnaire statements not reaching consensus were re-distributed to herbalists for re-consideration via a further questionnaire.

Results: eleven CHM practitioners based in the UK were recruited. Six themes emerged from interviews and 85 statements regarding clinical practice were produced. When these were distributed via a questionnaire, 83 reached group consensus (97.6%) with a response rate of 100%. In the subsequent questionnaire containing eight statements, six reached group consensus (75%) with a response rate of 100%. A total of 84 statements are presented in the concluding set of clinical practice guidelines, each one included following an assessment of relevance to clinical practice, which was independent of final group consensus rating. These statements were graded from A (strong consensus) to D (consensus not achieved), determined by considering the median and interquartile range of responses per statement.

Conclusion: the Delphi method has been used successfully to facilitate a systematic and rigorous practitioner consultation exercise. This has resulted in the development of clinical practice guidelines that reflect routine CHM prescribing practices for PCOS. These guidelines will be used to inform the design of a forthcoming clinical study
1876-3820
9-123
Lai, Lily
573e6c9c-1944-4aeb-8d68-e039c381a6cb
Flower, Andrew
5256a2c8-6e74-49be-acc8-463ed3c18c6a
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Lai, Lily
573e6c9c-1944-4aeb-8d68-e039c381a6cb
Flower, Andrew
5256a2c8-6e74-49be-acc8-463ed3c18c6a
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Lai, Lily, Flower, Andrew, Moore, Michael and Lewith, George (2012) Developing clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a mixed-method modified Delphi study. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 4S, 9-123. (doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2012.07.586).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common female reproductive endocrine disorder, affecting 6–18% of women of reproductive age. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is gaining popularity in the UK and has been historically effective for symptoms of PCOS. However, it remains unclear what constitutes routine clinical practice in CHM in order to conduct further rigorous research.

Aim: the aim of this study was to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of PCOS using CHM.

Method: following a modified Delphi method, CHM practitioners were purposively sampled and interviewed to explore their views on CHM prescribing for PCOS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic and framework analysis was applied to transcriptions to formulate statements of key clinical practice points. These statements were distributed via an online questionnaire to the same herbalists who were invited to rate their agreement with each statement on a 7-point Likert scale. Group consensus on a statement was defined a priori as a median Likert score of 5 or more. Questionnaire statements not reaching consensus were re-distributed to herbalists for re-consideration via a further questionnaire.

Results: eleven CHM practitioners based in the UK were recruited. Six themes emerged from interviews and 85 statements regarding clinical practice were produced. When these were distributed via a questionnaire, 83 reached group consensus (97.6%) with a response rate of 100%. In the subsequent questionnaire containing eight statements, six reached group consensus (75%) with a response rate of 100%. A total of 84 statements are presented in the concluding set of clinical practice guidelines, each one included following an assessment of relevance to clinical practice, which was independent of final group consensus rating. These statements were graded from A (strong consensus) to D (consensus not achieved), determined by considering the median and interquartile range of responses per statement.

Conclusion: the Delphi method has been used successfully to facilitate a systematic and rigorous practitioner consultation exercise. This has resulted in the development of clinical practice guidelines that reflect routine CHM prescribing practices for PCOS. These guidelines will be used to inform the design of a forthcoming clinical study

Text
Lai_2012_Delphi_EuJIM_Conference.pdf - Other
Download (70kB)

More information

Published date: September 2012
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 347586
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/347586
ISSN: 1876-3820
PURE UUID: e05f9352-6ba9-4c56-86c2-36eecd0455c5
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jan 2013 11:16
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lily Lai
Author: Andrew Flower
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD
Author: George Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×