The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Monitoring marine macroalgae: the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of biodiversity surrogates

Monitoring marine macroalgae: the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of biodiversity surrogates
Monitoring marine macroalgae: the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of biodiversity surrogates
Aim:? To examine the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of commonly employed biodiversity surrogates in subtidal macroalgae assemblages.

Location:? South-west Australia.

Methods:? The relationship between biodiversity surrogates and univariate and multivariate species-level patterns was tested at multiple spatial scales, ranging from metres (between quadrats) to hundreds of kilometres (between regions), using samples collected from almost 2000 km of temperate coastline that represented almost 300 species. Biodiversity surrogates included commonly used cost-effective alternatives to species-level sampling, such as those derived from functional groups and from taxonomic aggregation.

Results:? Overall, surrogates derived from taxonomic aggregation to genus or family level correlated strongly with species-level patterns, although the family-level surrogate was a less effective predictor of species richness at large spatial scales. Surrogates derived from aggregation to coarser taxonomic levels and functional groups performed poorly, while the effectiveness of a surrogate measure derived from canopy-forming species improved with increasing spatial scale.

Main conclusions:? A critical, but rarely examined, assumption of biodiversity surrogates is that the relationship between surrogate and species-level patterns is consistent in both space and time, and across a range of spatial and temporal scales. As the performance of all surrogates was, to some degree, scale-dependent, this work empirically demonstrated the need to consider the spatial extent and design of any biodiversity monitoring programme when choosing cost-effective alternatives to species-level data collection.
cost-effective sampling, diversity monitoring, spatial scales, species richness, subtidal reefs, taxonomic resolution
1366-9516
985-995
Smale, Dan A.
19528a3a-f66c-474d-ae13-c6405b8014ab
Smale, Dan A.
19528a3a-f66c-474d-ae13-c6405b8014ab

Smale, Dan A. (2010) Monitoring marine macroalgae: the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of biodiversity surrogates. Diversity and Distributions, 16 (6), 985-995. (doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00709.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim:? To examine the influence of spatial scale on the usefulness of commonly employed biodiversity surrogates in subtidal macroalgae assemblages.

Location:? South-west Australia.

Methods:? The relationship between biodiversity surrogates and univariate and multivariate species-level patterns was tested at multiple spatial scales, ranging from metres (between quadrats) to hundreds of kilometres (between regions), using samples collected from almost 2000 km of temperate coastline that represented almost 300 species. Biodiversity surrogates included commonly used cost-effective alternatives to species-level sampling, such as those derived from functional groups and from taxonomic aggregation.

Results:? Overall, surrogates derived from taxonomic aggregation to genus or family level correlated strongly with species-level patterns, although the family-level surrogate was a less effective predictor of species richness at large spatial scales. Surrogates derived from aggregation to coarser taxonomic levels and functional groups performed poorly, while the effectiveness of a surrogate measure derived from canopy-forming species improved with increasing spatial scale.

Main conclusions:? A critical, but rarely examined, assumption of biodiversity surrogates is that the relationship between surrogate and species-level patterns is consistent in both space and time, and across a range of spatial and temporal scales. As the performance of all surrogates was, to some degree, scale-dependent, this work empirically demonstrated the need to consider the spatial extent and design of any biodiversity monitoring programme when choosing cost-effective alternatives to species-level data collection.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2010
Keywords: cost-effective sampling, diversity monitoring, spatial scales, species richness, subtidal reefs, taxonomic resolution
Organisations: Ocean Biochemistry & Ecosystems

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 348305
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348305
ISSN: 1366-9516
PURE UUID: f354d249-71d2-47bf-8615-a8a2ec3b1a70

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Feb 2013 11:56
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dan A. Smale

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×