The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Re-orienting international relations: on pragmatism, pluralism and practical reasoning

Re-orienting international relations: on pragmatism, pluralism and practical reasoning
Re-orienting international relations: on pragmatism, pluralism and practical reasoning
This essay presents the case for a re-orientation of International Relations (IR) in terms of the pragmatist ethos sketched in the work of John Dewey. It argues that contemporary IR theory is characterised by the threat of theoreticism and that this danger is heightened by the confusion between pictures and theories. The essay goes on to indicate how a pragmatist orientation to issues of government in terms of a processual ethic could provide a framework within which the pluralism characteristic of contemporary IR is reconceived in terms of a mutual agonism (rather than antagonism) in the service of practical reasoning and judgement. Viewing IR as a form of practical philosophy oriented to the government of the common affairs of humanity, this orientation stresses the distinct roles that accounts directed to world-disclosure and those directed to action-coordination play in IR and argues that the former are crucial to reflection on problem constitution, while the latter are vital to reflection on problems.
653-673
Owen, D.
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Owen, D.
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58

Owen, D. (2002) Re-orienting international relations: on pragmatism, pluralism and practical reasoning. Millennium, 31 (3), 653-673.

Record type: Article

Abstract

This essay presents the case for a re-orientation of International Relations (IR) in terms of the pragmatist ethos sketched in the work of John Dewey. It argues that contemporary IR theory is characterised by the threat of theoreticism and that this danger is heightened by the confusion between pictures and theories. The essay goes on to indicate how a pragmatist orientation to issues of government in terms of a processual ethic could provide a framework within which the pluralism characteristic of contemporary IR is reconceived in terms of a mutual agonism (rather than antagonism) in the service of practical reasoning and judgement. Viewing IR as a form of practical philosophy oriented to the government of the common affairs of humanity, this orientation stresses the distinct roles that accounts directed to world-disclosure and those directed to action-coordination play in IR and argues that the former are crucial to reflection on problem constitution, while the latter are vital to reflection on problems.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 34844
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/34844
PURE UUID: 8e7467cf-e5b7-43a6-b014-98204a47b1fd
ORCID for D. Owen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-6332

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 May 2006
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:49

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×