The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes

A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes
A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes
Axes of rotation e.g. at the knee, are often generated from clinical gait analysis data to be used in the assessment of kinematic abnormalities, the diagnosis of disease, or the ongoing monitoring of a patient's condition. They are additionally used in musculoskeletal models to aid in the description of joint and segment kinematics for patient specific analyses. Currently available methods to describe joint axes from segment marker positions share the problem that when one segment is transformed into the coordinate system of another, artefacts associated with motion of the markers relative to the bone can become magnified. In an attempt to address this problem, a symmetrical axis of rotation approach (SARA) is presented here to determine a unique axis of rotation that can consider the movement of two dynamic body segments simultaneously, and then compared its performance in a survey against a number of previously proposed techniques. Using a generated virtual joint, with superimposed marker error conditions to represent skin movement artefacts, fitting methods (geometric axis fit, cylinder axis fit, algebraic axis fit) and transformation techniques (axis transformation technique, mean helical axis, Schwartz approach) were classified and compared with the SARA. Nearly all approaches were able to estimate the axis of rotation to within an RMS error of 0.1 cm at large ranges of motion (90°). Although the geometric axis fit produced the least RMS error of approximately 1.2 cm at lower ranges of motion (5°) with a stationary axis, the SARA and Axis Transformation Technique outperformed all other approaches under the most demanding marker artefact conditions for all ranges of motion. The cylinder and algebraic axis fit approaches were unable to compute competitive AoR estimates. Whilst these initial results using the SARA are promising and are fast enough to be determined “on-line”, the technique must now be proven in a clinical environment.
axis of rotation
0021-9290
2150-2157
Ehrig, Rainald M.
039b8e91-4867-4a1b-8b73-0381c6411d40
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Duda, Georg N.
ac4e207b-3e2e-4c84-a6c4-cb67531f890b
Heller, Markus O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Ehrig, Rainald M.
039b8e91-4867-4a1b-8b73-0381c6411d40
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Duda, Georg N.
ac4e207b-3e2e-4c84-a6c4-cb67531f890b
Heller, Markus O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829

Ehrig, Rainald M., Taylor, William R., Duda, Georg N. and Heller, Markus O. (2007) A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes. Journal of Biomechanics, 40 (10), 2150-2157. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.026).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Axes of rotation e.g. at the knee, are often generated from clinical gait analysis data to be used in the assessment of kinematic abnormalities, the diagnosis of disease, or the ongoing monitoring of a patient's condition. They are additionally used in musculoskeletal models to aid in the description of joint and segment kinematics for patient specific analyses. Currently available methods to describe joint axes from segment marker positions share the problem that when one segment is transformed into the coordinate system of another, artefacts associated with motion of the markers relative to the bone can become magnified. In an attempt to address this problem, a symmetrical axis of rotation approach (SARA) is presented here to determine a unique axis of rotation that can consider the movement of two dynamic body segments simultaneously, and then compared its performance in a survey against a number of previously proposed techniques. Using a generated virtual joint, with superimposed marker error conditions to represent skin movement artefacts, fitting methods (geometric axis fit, cylinder axis fit, algebraic axis fit) and transformation techniques (axis transformation technique, mean helical axis, Schwartz approach) were classified and compared with the SARA. Nearly all approaches were able to estimate the axis of rotation to within an RMS error of 0.1 cm at large ranges of motion (90°). Although the geometric axis fit produced the least RMS error of approximately 1.2 cm at lower ranges of motion (5°) with a stationary axis, the SARA and Axis Transformation Technique outperformed all other approaches under the most demanding marker artefact conditions for all ranges of motion. The cylinder and algebraic axis fit approaches were unable to compute competitive AoR estimates. Whilst these initial results using the SARA are promising and are fast enough to be determined “on-line”, the technique must now be proven in a clinical environment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 December 2006
Published date: 2007
Keywords: axis of rotation
Organisations: Bioengineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 348514
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348514
ISSN: 0021-9290
PURE UUID: 4a750c1d-1a34-4497-87a8-40d09b0ae042
ORCID for Markus O. Heller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1135

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Feb 2013 11:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rainald M. Ehrig
Author: William R. Taylor
Author: Georg N. Duda

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×