The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant

Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant
Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant
Background
Short-stemmed hip implants were introduced to conserve proximal bone mass and may facilitate the use of minimally invasive surgery, in which smaller incisions limit access to the joint. This limited access may increase the risk of surgical mal-positioning of the implant, however the sensitivity of femoral loading to such mal-positioning of a short-stemmed implant has not been studied.

Methods
Finite element models were developed of a femur and a short-stemmed implant positioned to reproduce the intact hip centre, as well as with the implant placed in increased anteversion or offset. The effect of these surgical variables on femoral loading was examined for walking and stair climbing using loads from a validated musculoskeletal model. Results of the implanted models were compared with an intact model to evaluate stress shielding.

Findings
Implant position had little influence on cortical strains along the length of the diaphysis, although strains decreased by up to 95% at the neck resection level compared to the intact femur. In the proximal Gruen zones I and VII strain energy density among the implanted models varied by up to 0.4 kJ/m3 (28%) and 0.6 kJ/m3 (24%) under walking and stair climbing, respectively. All implanted models showed characteristic proximal stress shielding, indicated by a decrease in strain energy density of up to 5.4 kJ/m3 (69%) compared to the intact femur.

Interpretation
Small changes in stem placement would likely have little influence on the internal loading of the femur after bone ingrowth has been achieved, however a reduction in strain energy density and therefore stress shielding was seen even for a short-stemmed implant, which may have consequences for longer-term bone remodelling.
conservative hip implant, offset, anteversion, femoral loading, finite element, minimally invasive surgery
0268-0033
431-439
Speirs, A.D.
f06f0857-33b6-416f-a52a-17ce6e8a72a2
Heller, M.O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Taylor, W.R.
4f1cd2b0-4963-4b10-bbde-da586c069e77
Duda, G.N.
32d09622-34ad-49dd-8314-3f61c99a764e
Perka, C.
075d2c0e-b277-4a76-8b14-548bce0bb133
Speirs, A.D.
f06f0857-33b6-416f-a52a-17ce6e8a72a2
Heller, M.O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Taylor, W.R.
4f1cd2b0-4963-4b10-bbde-da586c069e77
Duda, G.N.
32d09622-34ad-49dd-8314-3f61c99a764e
Perka, C.
075d2c0e-b277-4a76-8b14-548bce0bb133

Speirs, A.D., Heller, M.O., Taylor, W.R., Duda, G.N. and Perka, C. (2007) Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clinical Biomechanics, 22 (4), 431-439. (doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Short-stemmed hip implants were introduced to conserve proximal bone mass and may facilitate the use of minimally invasive surgery, in which smaller incisions limit access to the joint. This limited access may increase the risk of surgical mal-positioning of the implant, however the sensitivity of femoral loading to such mal-positioning of a short-stemmed implant has not been studied.

Methods
Finite element models were developed of a femur and a short-stemmed implant positioned to reproduce the intact hip centre, as well as with the implant placed in increased anteversion or offset. The effect of these surgical variables on femoral loading was examined for walking and stair climbing using loads from a validated musculoskeletal model. Results of the implanted models were compared with an intact model to evaluate stress shielding.

Findings
Implant position had little influence on cortical strains along the length of the diaphysis, although strains decreased by up to 95% at the neck resection level compared to the intact femur. In the proximal Gruen zones I and VII strain energy density among the implanted models varied by up to 0.4 kJ/m3 (28%) and 0.6 kJ/m3 (24%) under walking and stair climbing, respectively. All implanted models showed characteristic proximal stress shielding, indicated by a decrease in strain energy density of up to 5.4 kJ/m3 (69%) compared to the intact femur.

Interpretation
Small changes in stem placement would likely have little influence on the internal loading of the femur after bone ingrowth has been achieved, however a reduction in strain energy density and therefore stress shielding was seen even for a short-stemmed implant, which may have consequences for longer-term bone remodelling.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 5 February 2007
Published date: May 2007
Keywords: conservative hip implant, offset, anteversion, femoral loading, finite element, minimally invasive surgery
Organisations: Bioengineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 348517
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348517
ISSN: 0268-0033
PURE UUID: f86044f3-b92f-46b4-8431-6331a2581420
ORCID for M.O. Heller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1135

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Feb 2013 12:52
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.D. Speirs
Author: M.O. Heller ORCID iD
Author: W.R. Taylor
Author: G.N. Duda
Author: C. Perka

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×