The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant

Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant
Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant
A trend in total hip arthroplasty surgery has been to design more bone-preserving procedures, especially for younger patients. This study investigated the final implant positioning of a short metaphyseal femoral neck type of implant to determine whether leg length, caput collum diaphysis (CCD) angle, and offset could be re-created with different levels of femoral neck resection. Ten cadaveric hips in 6 whole-body specimens were used, with 3 fiducial markers to allow registration of computer navigation points to computed tomography scan data. Three femoral neck resection levels were investigated: 0 mm, +5 mm (the recommended level of resection), and +10 mm from the base of the femoral neck. Results showed that the CCD angle was significantly higher with 0-mm neck cut and the offset was lower, whereas the highest neck cut had longer leg-length results. Surgeons who use a short metaphyseal stem need to realize the importance of a proper femoral neck cut to restore anatomic parameters as well as the possible benefit of computer-assisted surgery to restore these anatomic parameters during surgery.
0147-7447
18-21
Mihalko, W.M.
93fa15d2-45f7-4a15-9c34-ca3cd0d76bf9
Saleh, K.J.
39bff6a8-c609-40e0-af1c-40bdc0da5ef9
Heller, M.O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Mollard, B.
2f3cea07-f6fb-4e00-81a0-7957fa378e23
König, C.
1d5d6617-571b-4b22-a1a2-083162035e7a
Kammerzell, S.
d4a5dca4-e556-4bf2-957f-7a2ed9411025
Mihalko, W.M.
93fa15d2-45f7-4a15-9c34-ca3cd0d76bf9
Saleh, K.J.
39bff6a8-c609-40e0-af1c-40bdc0da5ef9
Heller, M.O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Mollard, B.
2f3cea07-f6fb-4e00-81a0-7957fa378e23
König, C.
1d5d6617-571b-4b22-a1a2-083162035e7a
Kammerzell, S.
d4a5dca4-e556-4bf2-957f-7a2ed9411025

Mihalko, W.M., Saleh, K.J., Heller, M.O., Mollard, B., König, C. and Kammerzell, S. (2009) Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant. Orthopedics, 32, supplement 10, 18-21. (doi:10.3928/01477447-20090915-53). (PMID:19835302)

Record type: Article

Abstract

A trend in total hip arthroplasty surgery has been to design more bone-preserving procedures, especially for younger patients. This study investigated the final implant positioning of a short metaphyseal femoral neck type of implant to determine whether leg length, caput collum diaphysis (CCD) angle, and offset could be re-created with different levels of femoral neck resection. Ten cadaveric hips in 6 whole-body specimens were used, with 3 fiducial markers to allow registration of computer navigation points to computed tomography scan data. Three femoral neck resection levels were investigated: 0 mm, +5 mm (the recommended level of resection), and +10 mm from the base of the femoral neck. Results showed that the CCD angle was significantly higher with 0-mm neck cut and the offset was lower, whereas the highest neck cut had longer leg-length results. Surgeons who use a short metaphyseal stem need to realize the importance of a proper femoral neck cut to restore anatomic parameters as well as the possible benefit of computer-assisted surgery to restore these anatomic parameters during surgery.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2009
Organisations: Bioengineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 348521
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348521
ISSN: 0147-7447
PURE UUID: 3f7634db-1baa-4e7d-b104-db5b277f6dfa
ORCID for M.O. Heller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1135

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Feb 2013 14:32
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: W.M. Mihalko
Author: K.J. Saleh
Author: M.O. Heller ORCID iD
Author: B. Mollard
Author: C. König
Author: S. Kammerzell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×