Bringing the politics back in: public value in Westminster parliamentary government
Bringing the politics back in: public value in Westminster parliamentary government
We challenge the usefulness of the ‘public value’ approach in Westminster systems with their dominant hierarchies of control, strong roles for ministers, and tight authorizing regimes underpinned by disciplined two-party systems. We identify two key confusions: about public value as theory, and in defining who are ‘public managers’. We identify five linked core assumptions in public value: the benign view of large-scale organizations; the primacy of management; the relevance of private sector experience; the downgrading of party politics; and public servants as platonic guardians. We identify two key dilemmas around the ‘primacy of party politics’ and the notion that public managers should play the role of platonic guardians deciding the public interest. We illustrate our argument with short case studies of: the David Kelly story from the UK; the ‘children overboard’ scandal in Australia; the ‘mad cow disease’ outbreak in the UK; the Yorkshire health authority's ‘tea-parties’, and the Cave Creek disaster in New Zealand.
161-183
Rhodes, R.A.W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948
Wanna, John
53944cf9-5e34-4033-9485-3f8eb90dddc2
Rhodes, R.A.W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948
Wanna, John
53944cf9-5e34-4033-9485-3f8eb90dddc2
Rhodes, R.A.W. and Wanna, John
(2009)
Bringing the politics back in: public value in Westminster parliamentary government.
Public Administration, 87 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01763.x).
Abstract
We challenge the usefulness of the ‘public value’ approach in Westminster systems with their dominant hierarchies of control, strong roles for ministers, and tight authorizing regimes underpinned by disciplined two-party systems. We identify two key confusions: about public value as theory, and in defining who are ‘public managers’. We identify five linked core assumptions in public value: the benign view of large-scale organizations; the primacy of management; the relevance of private sector experience; the downgrading of party politics; and public servants as platonic guardians. We identify two key dilemmas around the ‘primacy of party politics’ and the notion that public managers should play the role of platonic guardians deciding the public interest. We illustrate our argument with short case studies of: the David Kelly story from the UK; the ‘children overboard’ scandal in Australia; the ‘mad cow disease’ outbreak in the UK; the Yorkshire health authority's ‘tea-parties’, and the Cave Creek disaster in New Zealand.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 May 2009
Organisations:
Social Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 348979
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348979
ISSN: 0033-3298
PURE UUID: 5397b658-6225-4c09-888e-27e5c7fe3654
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Feb 2013 12:16
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John Wanna
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics