The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hospital contributory schemes and the NHS debates 1937-46: the rejection of social insurance in the British welfare state?

Hospital contributory schemes and the NHS debates 1937-46: the rejection of social insurance in the British welfare state?
Hospital contributory schemes and the NHS debates 1937-46: the rejection of social insurance in the British welfare state?
This article considers the discussion and rejection of a social insurance model of funding for the British National Health Service. Specifically it asks why the hospital contributory scheme movement had so little impact on policy debates in the 1940s. We argue that at the start of the policy-making process serious consideration was given to the incorporation of this mode of funding, not least because the contributory schemes, with some ten million members, played a major role in financing existing voluntary hospital provision. Early sections describe the growth and nature of the schemes, noting that, despite their large working-class constituency and the presence of labour movement representatives amongst their leadership, they remained peripheral to discussion of reform in the interwar period. We then trace the emergence of the proposal for an insurance-based ‘hotel charge’ in civil servants' discussions about hospital funding following the Beveridge Report. Officials, however, remained sceptical about the contributory schemes' capacity to deliver a comprehensive and efficient funding mechanism, given their lack of uniformity, the gaps in their coverage, and the limited progress of reciprocal arrangements between them. Finally, we note the ineffectiveness of the British Hospital Contributory Schemes Association as a player in the policy community. Its leadership had no clear strategy for influencing events and was reluctant to deploy pressure group tactics such as lobbying through the press or parliament. Crucially, the movement was divided internally between those members who supported the voluntary system and others who welcomed a publicly funded health service.
0955-2359
170-192
Gorsky, M.
5933e587-94af-4cbe-8b55-72956dff25b6
Mohan, J.
01d0f96b-aee7-4f4d-ad3f-e177231005f6
Willis, T.
d821cf82-6cd6-433f-b3b1-fc041c1b1e40
Gorsky, M.
5933e587-94af-4cbe-8b55-72956dff25b6
Mohan, J.
01d0f96b-aee7-4f4d-ad3f-e177231005f6
Willis, T.
d821cf82-6cd6-433f-b3b1-fc041c1b1e40

Gorsky, M., Mohan, J. and Willis, T. (2005) Hospital contributory schemes and the NHS debates 1937-46: the rejection of social insurance in the British welfare state? Twentieth Century British History, 16 (2), 170-192. (doi:10.1093/tweceb/hwi025).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article considers the discussion and rejection of a social insurance model of funding for the British National Health Service. Specifically it asks why the hospital contributory scheme movement had so little impact on policy debates in the 1940s. We argue that at the start of the policy-making process serious consideration was given to the incorporation of this mode of funding, not least because the contributory schemes, with some ten million members, played a major role in financing existing voluntary hospital provision. Early sections describe the growth and nature of the schemes, noting that, despite their large working-class constituency and the presence of labour movement representatives amongst their leadership, they remained peripheral to discussion of reform in the interwar period. We then trace the emergence of the proposal for an insurance-based ‘hotel charge’ in civil servants' discussions about hospital funding following the Beveridge Report. Officials, however, remained sceptical about the contributory schemes' capacity to deliver a comprehensive and efficient funding mechanism, given their lack of uniformity, the gaps in their coverage, and the limited progress of reciprocal arrangements between them. Finally, we note the ineffectiveness of the British Hospital Contributory Schemes Association as a player in the policy community. Its leadership had no clear strategy for influencing events and was reluctant to deploy pressure group tactics such as lobbying through the press or parliament. Crucially, the movement was divided internally between those members who supported the voluntary system and others who welcomed a publicly funded health service.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 34898
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/34898
ISSN: 0955-2359
PURE UUID: 3496fd33-be2d-4d1e-b759-fc545d7d17bb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Gorsky
Author: J. Mohan
Author: T. Willis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×