Using Stakeholders Preferences in Multi-attribute Decision Making: Elicitation and Aggregation Issue
Using Stakeholders Preferences in Multi-attribute Decision Making: Elicitation and Aggregation Issue
This paper reviews the challenges in applying multi-attribute decision making (MADM) tools to complex environmental resource management problems. MADM tools offer a means of selecting among different alternatives (projects, programmes, futures etc..), they provide a framework in which to display data, and are frequently used to incorporate stakeholder preferences. In many instances, MADM applications have implicitly applied axioms of consumer preference and utility theory, without managing the consequences of those assumptions. In particular, it is frequently assumed in MADM tools that utility functions can be defined for individuals; that indifferences curves are continuous and downward sloping; and that evaluation criteria are compensatory. A growing body of literature on lexicographic preferences suggests otherwise. Difficulties associated with preference elicitation and aggregation also constrain the usability of MADM tools. While these problems have been addressed in the contingent valuation method (CVM) literature, the lessons learned have been slow to be transferred to the area of MADM. In conclusion, recognising the theoretical limitations of MADM tools could lead to alternative uses for such tools, such as representation aids for stakeholder engagement or conflict management.
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia
Tompkins, Emma
a6116704-7140-4e37-bea1-2cbf39b138c3
2003
Tompkins, Emma
a6116704-7140-4e37-bea1-2cbf39b138c3
Tompkins, Emma
(2003)
Using Stakeholders Preferences in Multi-attribute Decision Making: Elicitation and Aggregation Issue
(Environmental Change and Management, ECM 01-13)
Norwich, GB.
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia
13pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
This paper reviews the challenges in applying multi-attribute decision making (MADM) tools to complex environmental resource management problems. MADM tools offer a means of selecting among different alternatives (projects, programmes, futures etc..), they provide a framework in which to display data, and are frequently used to incorporate stakeholder preferences. In many instances, MADM applications have implicitly applied axioms of consumer preference and utility theory, without managing the consequences of those assumptions. In particular, it is frequently assumed in MADM tools that utility functions can be defined for individuals; that indifferences curves are continuous and downward sloping; and that evaluation criteria are compensatory. A growing body of literature on lexicographic preferences suggests otherwise. Difficulties associated with preference elicitation and aggregation also constrain the usability of MADM tools. While these problems have been addressed in the contingent valuation method (CVM) literature, the lessons learned have been slow to be transferred to the area of MADM. In conclusion, recognising the theoretical limitations of MADM tools could lead to alternative uses for such tools, such as representation aids for stakeholder engagement or conflict management.
Text
Tompkins-SH-prefs-MADM-ecm_2003_13.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2003
Organisations:
Global Env Change & Earth Observation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 349075
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/349075
ISSN: 0967-8875
PURE UUID: e7fa1e15-80fb-4f9e-b4e7-b12ffb92953c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Mar 2013 14:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:39
Export record
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
